Re: RIF+SPARQL (was Re: Entailment regimes open issues)

On 16 February 2010 14:42, Chimezie Ogbuji <ogbujic@ccf.org> wrote:
> On 2/8/10 10:25 AM, "Birte Glimm" <birte.glimm@comlab.ox.ac.uk> wrote:
>>> I've expressed interest in the past in helping here and I do know/care about
>>> the intersection (personally in the research I do and in how we use SPARQL
>>> at the workplace).
>>
>> Chime, if  you want to co-edit that section I am happy to introduce
>> you to how I handle the problematic cases for RDF(S) and OWL so far.
>
> Certainly.  If it is okay with you and the group.

:-) Absolutely fine with me. I'll soon (hopefully this evening) submit
an update which also covers OWL RDF-Based Semantics and the OWL RL
profile. All the RDF-Based entailment regimes are very similar, just
OWL Direct Semantics is a bit different. I hope RIF can be handled in
much the same way as the RDF-Based regimes. Maybe you can have a look
at the document and then either just start or we can discuss the
options for RIF in a teleconf for those interested in that.

Birte


>>
>> It is probably really straightforward, I just don't know RIF enough to
>> judge this. OWL Direct Semantics is certainly a bit different and even
>> OWL RDF-Based semantics introduces a view more pitfalls (infinite
>> answers from owl:TopDataProperty for example). For OWL I am confident
>> that I can define these and handle them appropriately. For RIF I would
>> consider it a bit risky because I might easily miss some corner cases.
>
>
> -- Chime
>
>
> ===================================
>
> P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
>
> Cleveland Clinic is ranked one of the top hospitals
> in America by U.S.News & World Report (2009).
> Visit us online at http://www.clevelandclinic.org for
> a complete listing of our services, staff and
> locations.
>
>
> Confidentiality Note:  This message is intended for use
> only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed
> and may contain information that is privileged,
> confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable
> law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended
> recipient or the employee or agent responsible for
> delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are
> hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
> copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If
> you have received this communication in error,  please
> contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in
> its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy.  Thank you.
>
>



-- 
Dr. Birte Glimm, Room 306
Computing Laboratory
Parks Road
Oxford
OX1 3QD
United Kingdom
+44 (0)1865 283529

Received on Tuesday, 16 February 2010 15:07:04 UTC