W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2010

SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. January 19, 2010

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 21:47:26 -0500
Message-ID: <4B53CBBE.4000409@thefigtrees.net>
To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
See http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2010-01-12

     *  Date of Call: Tuesday January 19, 2010
     * Time of Call: 15:00 UK, 10:00 (East US)
     * Dial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge, MA)
     * Dial-In #: + (Nice, France)
     * Dial-In #: +44.117.370.6152 (Bristol, UK)
     * Participant Access Code: 77277# (SPARQ)
     * IRC Channel: irc.w3.org port 6665 channel #sparql 
     * Web-based IRC (member-only): http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc 
(Firefox IRC addon: chatzilla)
     * Duration: 60 minutes
     * Chair: Lee Feigenbaum
     * Scribe: Olivier Corby (Tommi on deck) (Scribe List)
     * Link to Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2010-01-19

[edit] Agenda

     * Admin
           o PROPOSED: Approve minutes at 
           o Next meeting: 2010-01-26 @ 15:00 UK / 10:00 EST (scribe: 
Tommi K)
     * Comment handling - see http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Comments
     * Liaisons - Anything to report?
           o RIF WG (Axel)
           o RDB2RDF WG (Orri)
           o eGov (SteveH)
     * Document Reviews and Publication Decisions:
           o PROPOSED: publish 
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/update-1.1/ as new version of 
                 + Reviews: AndyS, Axel
           o PROPOSED: publish 
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/protocol-1.1/ plus new WSDL and Types 
files as new version of http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-protocol/
                 + Reviews: Axel, Luke
     * SemTech panel update
     * Test suite / test cases
           o We need a plan here, ASAP.
     * Overview document
     * Update ISSUEs,
           o ISSUE-27 - Expressivity of SPARQL 1.1 Update WHERE clauses. 
I read strong if not universal consensus in favor of WHERE clauses in 
update being full SPARQL 1.1 Query. I'd like to propose that as a 
replacement for the F2F2 resolution of this issue.
           o PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-25 with no change, noting that this 
is *allowed* by the definition of INSERT in the current SPARQL1.1 Update WD.
           o PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-38 with no change, noting that this 
is covered by the resolution of ISSUE-27 already.

Received on Monday, 18 January 2010 02:48:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:01:01 UTC