Re: [TF-LIB] Finalizing built-ins

On 23/02/2010 1:33 PM, Steve Harris wrote:
>> ** IN
>>
>> I suggest IN(arg,....) and NOT IN(arg,....)
>
> Full syntax would be "val [NOT] IN (arg,...)" - right? IN (...) on it's
> own would not be legal.

Yes.

It's an infix operator.  The LHS is an expression, the RHS a list of 
expressions.

	Andy

Received on Tuesday, 23 February 2010 16:58:46 UTC