- From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:18:43 -0500
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
This response seems good to me. Lee On 2/10/2010 10:36 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote: > Draft response for comment N3-1 > > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:N3-1 > > Sandro - there is the specific issue of expressions. As property paths > already use * and + for their natural regex meaning, expressions might > well need to be delimited anyway. It is a balance of what is the best > use of the undelimited form and delimited forms in the overall syntax, > together with design style and parser complexity. > > We could add something like: > """ > In N3Alternatives#Syntax there is discussion of including expressions in > N3. Property paths already use * and + for their regex meanings. Adding > expressions as well overloads several characters so possibly requiring > syntax to delimit an expression. > """ > > Andy > >
Received on Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:19:16 UTC