Re: Entailment regimes open issues

On 2/8/2010 2:02 AM, Ivan Herman wrote:
> I certainly agree with closing issues #28, #32, #40, #42.
>
> I would propose to leave #43 for a while to see how the SD work evolves.
> I predict that what you write below is true, but maybe discussions on SD
> will allow for a finer granularity...

I will close issues 28, 32, 40, and 42 if there is no concerns raised 
within the next 7 days.

Let's include issue 43 in our next TC discussion of service description.

Lee