- From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2010 12:07:09 -0500
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>
- CC: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>, "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 3/5/2010 11:52 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote: > On 05/03/2010 11:40 AM, Steve Harris wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Problem: >> >> There's no way to specify a separator string in the draft GROUP_CONCAT >> aggregate. I have a vague memory that we'd discussed this briefly >> somewhere, F2F2, or on a call maybe, but it's pretty hazy. This was >> brought up in Rob Vesse's recent comment. > > Steve - thanks for the detailed write up. > > As a process point, can we create an issue for this and explain we now > have an issue that must be addressed before LC in a reply to Rob Vesse. I think this is reasonable: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/55 > This is a good test of the aggregate design and I think its worth > spending some time on it. I'm happy to discuss, and in particular would like the final decision to come with a supporting test case or 3. Lee > > Andy > >
Received on Friday, 5 March 2010 17:07:59 UTC