- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 09:45:07 +0000
- To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- CC: Paul Gearon <gearon@ieee.org>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 18/01/2010 2:05 AM, Lee Feigenbaum wrote: > Thanks, Paul. > > Anyone who is swapped in on update -- please review these changes so > that we can decide on publishing the update document on Tuesday. The document looks OK for publishing in this cycle. Andy > > Lee > > Paul Gearon wrote: >> I've updated the Update document with the following: >> >> - Added a Terminology section. This should be a top-level section, not 1.2.2. I presume this will grow over time e.g merge with Graph Store >> - Removed the "Property Paths" section now that issue 38 has been >> resolved. and also "2.2 Basic Federated Query" is a time permitting feature. >> - Included reference to RFC 2119 terminology and added emphasized >> SHOULD and OPTIONAL comments. >> - Added note on discussion of blank nodes in DELETE templates. >> - Added note on discussion of INSERTs creating new graphs. >> - Added note on ambiguity around DELETE/INSERT and DELETE statements. >> - Added note on need to mention partially completed LOAD operations. >> - Added OPTIONAL description for graph management operations (for the >> sake of stores that don't support named graphs). Rather that picking out one feature that is optional, maybe better to simple note a service can reject any operation it does not wish to perform. >> >> The working copy is at: >> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/update-1.1/Overview.xml Issue 19 is mentioned twice (3.2 and A) Issue 21 is now closed. The References section is not ours. >> >> I think this is everything I needed for the moment. A lot of the >> things I have to do have been spread through various email threads, >> meeting minutes, and verbal conversations, so it's possible I've >> missed something. Please let me know. >> >> Regards, >> Paul Gearon >> >> > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. > For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email > ______________________________________________________________________
Received on Monday, 18 January 2010 09:45:39 UTC