Re: [ACTION-218] wrong header, should have been ACTION-218 instead

On 30/03/2010 7:04 PM, Axel Polleres wrote:
> sorry was referring to the wrong ACTION there...
>
> should have been
>   ACTION-218: Check back on ED-1

Looks good to me - I agree about only sending the first part which is 
about the overall design choice we have made.  After that decision, any 
  difference in details is interesting but isn't the core of the response.

 Andy

>
> Axel
>
> On 30 Mar 2010, at 19:01, Axel Polleres wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> please check
>>
>>   http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:ED-1
>>
>> I suggest to send only the first part of the draft response (until "best regards, Axel, on behalf of the WG")
>> as the official answer since the second part is more to understand/explain what he wants to achieve, but
>> with concrete examples missing, that would be speculative at best.
>>
>> best,
>> Axel
>
>
>
> Please consider the environment before printing this email.
>
> Find out more about Talis at http://www.talis.com/
> shared innovation™
>
> Any views or personal opinions expressed within this email may not be those of Talis Information Ltd or its employees. The content of this email message and any files that may be attached are confidential, and for the usage of the intended recipient only. If you are not the intended recipient, then please return this message to the sender and delete it. Any use of this e-mail by an unauthorised recipient is prohibited.
>
> Talis Information Ltd is a member of the Talis Group of companies and is registered in England No 3638278 with its registered office at Knights Court, Solihull Parkway, Birmingham Business Park, B37 7YB.

Received on Wednesday, 31 March 2010 11:01:01 UTC