Re: [TF-LIB] Finalizing built-ins

On 23/02/2010 2:09 PM, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
>> We could support dynamic function call. Possibilities include:
>> ?function(?arg1, ?arg2, ....)
>> CALL(?function, ?arg1, ?arg2, ....)
> I don't think dynamic function calls are a good idea at this point.
> Mainly because I don't think we really have time to consider the issue
> in any significant depth.


If we can find good names, I'll be more sanguine about no proper dynamic 
calls.  I will check the grammar can accommodate it regardless of the WG 
decision as future-proofing.


Received on Tuesday, 23 February 2010 16:53:00 UTC