- From: Polleres, Axel <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 21:32:49 -0000
- To: <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Accidently replied to andy only ----- Original Message ----- From: Polleres, Axel To: 'andy.seaborne@talis.com' <andy.seaborne@talis.com> Sent: Wed Mar 24 19:27:32 2010 Subject: Re: [test cases] ACTION-191 starting with some test cases for aggregates... Not yet, andy. That was just my guess so far what the results should be. ----- Original Message ----- From: Andy Seaborne <afs@talisplatform.com> To: Polleres, Axel Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org> Sent: Wed Mar 24 19:08:20 2010 Subject: Re: [test cases] ACTION-191 starting with some test cases for aggregates... Are these result calculated by an implementation and if so do you have the results in a standard format such as SPARQL XML results (or SPARQL JSON results or the DAWG RDF model representation of the results)? Andy On 24/03/2010 6:30 PM, Axel Polleres wrote: > ... Hi all, > > Re: ACTION-191 I was starting with some test cases for aggregates, mainly trying to write down some of the ones > suggested in Emanuele's mail [1]. > > Looking at the test cases README at the moment [2]... Question: > > * How were the test cases collected in DAWG? Any naming conventions you followed? > * did anyone do some scripts to provide the manifests for testcases in DAWG or were these all assembled manually? > * Also, is it possible to have alternative results? (for non-deterministic queries, e.g. sample) in the test format of DAWG? > * Organisation of test cases: Shall we do separate manifests per feature? etc. > > Would be good if the process could be re-explained briefly to those who haven't been in DAWG1.0 > > The initial test cases proposals attached (result format not yet proper SPARQL-result format): > > - agg_spec1: > query: agg_spec1.sparql > data: agg_spec1.ttl > result: agg_spec1.result > Description: example from current Section 9.1 > > - agg_spec2: > query: agg_spec2.sparql > data: agg_spec2.ttl > result: agg_spec2.result > Description: example from end of current Section 9 which is used for explaining the Aggregation algebra > > - agg_spec2b: > query: agg_spec2.sparql > data: agg_spec2b.ttl > result: agg_spec2b.result TBD > Description: example from end of current Section 9 which is used for explaining the Aggregation algebra, but now with > wrong-typed input data, no result yet, becauseyet to be decided. > > - agg_edv1: > query: agg_edv1.sparql > data: agg_edv1.ttl > result: agg_edv1.result > Description: 1st example from Emanuele's mail [1], return names and number of books per author. > > - agg_edv1b: > query: agg_edv1.sparql > data: agg_edv1b.ttl > result: agg_edv1b.result > Description: 1st example from Emanuele's mail [1], return names and number of books per author, > but with author with two names. > > - agg_edv2: > query: agg_edv2.sparql > data: agg_edv2.ttl > result: agg_edv2.result > Description: adapted from 2nd example from Emanuele's mail [1], the average number of books written > by authors that wrote at least 5 books. > > - agg_edv2b: > query: agg_edv2b.sparql > data: agg_edv2.ttl > result: agg_edv2b.result > Description: adapted from 2nd example from Emanuele's mail [1], the average number of books written > by authors that wrote at least 5 books. Do we allow ungrouped/non-aggregated values? > Does it mean that aggregation is over the whole solution set? > - agg_edv3: > query: agg_edv3.sparql > data: agg_edv3.ttl TBD > result: TBD > Description: adapted from Emanuele's mail [1], sum all of books of all organisations, summing the counts of books per author. > only count outhors with more than 5 books, and organisations with more than 10 books. > Note that this counts books potentially twice if authors have several affiliations. > Test data with non-double-affiliated authors > > - agg_edv3b: > query: agg_edv3.sparql > data: agg_edv3b.ttl TBD > result: TBD > Description: adapted from Emanuele's mail [1], sum all of books of all organisations, summing the counts of books per author. > only count outhors with more than 5 books, and organisations with more than 10 books. > Note that this counts books potentially twice if authors have several affiliations. > Test data withdouble-affiliated authors. > > - agg_edv4: > query: agg_edv4.sparql > data: agg_edv4.ttl TBD > result: TBD > Description: from Emanuele's mail [1], ask for the research topics for which > the Italian authors have published more than the Swiss ones. > > > best, > Axel > > 1. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Feb/0006.html > 2. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/README.html > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. > For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email > ______________________________________________________________________
Received on Wednesday, 24 March 2010 21:33:23 UTC