Re: [TF-PP] Document now in CVS

On 24/11/2009 10:04 AM, Ivan Herman wrote:
> Yeah, I know...:-(
> My bigger issue is simple, in fact: I would like the path design to
> cover the use case
> I did not really fight for that one because I had the feeling the path
> expression should cover it. I was wrong:-(
> Ivan

Path lengths added to issues section.  I've noted that one objective 
(from the straw poll discussion) was to at least not block this 
possibility in the future.


Received on Monday, 4 January 2010 12:12:07 UTC