- From: David Charboneau <dcharbon@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 09:21:07 -0500
- To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 5 January 2010 15:16:57 UTC
I asked around and was directed toward a W3C specification in the Web Services area that sets a precedent for specifying optional operations in WSDL. One example is the specification for PUT in WS-Transfer ( http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/edcopies/wst.html#Put ), What's more, the specification provides a WSDL that defines all operations in a single interface, including the optional operations. I would propose, then, for protocol that we could define a single interface with both the query and update operations and have language in the protocol document stating something like: A conforming service provider MUST provide one of the following implementations of the SparqlProtocol interface: 1. The query operation 2. The update operation 3. Both the query and update operations. David Charboneau dcharbon@us.ibm.com
Received on Tuesday, 5 January 2010 15:16:57 UTC