- From: Chimezie Ogbuji <ogbujic@ccf.org>
- Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:48:26 -0400
- To: "Ivan Herman" <ivan@w3.org>
- cc: "Birte Glimm" <birte.glimm@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, "SPARQL Working Group WG" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>, "Axel Polleres" <axel.polleres@deri.org>, "Sandro Hawke" <sandro@w3.org>, "Jos de Bruijn" <debruijn@inf.unibz.it>
Ivan, On 3/13/10 5:19 AM, "Ivan Herman" <ivan@w3.org> wrote: > Chime, > I do not understand... Okay, I'll see if I can help with that. I've sent Jos a separate email about this as well. > On 2010-3-12 21:10 , Chimezie Ogbuji wrote: ..snip.. > My understanding of the proposed semantics (by Axel) for rif:imports is > that this combination is transformed as follows: > > 1. Starting point > G: _:a rdf:type _:b . > <> rif:imports <R> . > R: empty > > 2. Apply the semantics > G': _:a rdf:type _:b > R': Import(G, <http://www.w3.org/2007/rif-import-profile#Simple>) > > (whether the <> rif:imports <R> is removed from G is still an open > question but does not seem to influence this issue) Okay, but independent of how rif:imports is interpreted (for a lack of a better word), the SG still only has one triple relevant to RIF-simple entailment, right?: _:a rdf:type _:b > 3. From the RIF point of view, that is equivalent to: > R'' : _a # _b . > > (using RIF's unique id-s which look very much like skolemization to me). Okay, this is the point where the issue comes in. I'm not sure what you mean by 'from the RIF point of view', because - as I understand it - entailment does not involve any RIF interpretation of the RDF graph (which is the reason why we need to embed the triples from the scoping graph into the RIF document in order to interpret them using RIF semantics). So, at this point (i.e., before 3 above) we form the following combination: <Rempty,G''> Where G'' is sk(G'): <unique-URI-1> rdf:type <unique-URI-2> (lets refer to this triple as t1) The problem is that there is no (simple) interpretation for G'' in which IEXT(IS(rdf:type)) is empty. Since, G'' is ground, we know I(t1) is true and that IEXT(IS(rdf:type)) must not be empty (from what tr/rdf-mt says about how simple entailment interprets ground RDF graphs in 1.4). Since Rempty is empty, I_truth(I_isa(a,b))= false, and by the wording of condition 7, IEXT(IS(rdf:type)) must be empty. However, above we see that it can't be empty. > Do I severely miss something here? > Actually, if what you say was true, then I think there is a problem in > the RIF-RDF document. That has to be signalled to the RIF group I'm not sure if this necessarily indicates a problem with the RIF-RDF document (hopefully Jos can speak on this) but perhaps suggests that the embeddings (or at least some of them: Simple and RDF for example) should be made normative since implementations cannot practically implement RIF-RDF entailment without them. Or at least, a simple paragraph emphasizing the counter-intuitive behavior of combinations where there is not already a correspondence between triples, frames, and their terms. -- Chime =================================== P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail Cleveland Clinic is ranked one of the top hospitals in America by U.S.News & World Report (2009). Visit us online at http://www.clevelandclinic.org for a complete listing of our services, staff and locations. Confidentiality Note: This message is intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy. Thank you.
Received on Monday, 15 March 2010 00:49:11 UTC