- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:46:05 +0000
- To: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 23/03/2010 10:27 AM, Steve Harris wrote: > On 23 Mar 2010, at 10:13, Andy Seaborne wrote: > >> I've updated the grammar to cover aggregates. It still needs tidying >> to make it more regular. >> >> 1/ datasets in update >> >> Lee - I haven't included anything for datasets in update yet. >> >> I don't understand the relationship of WITH and FROM/FROM NAMED >> (probably not a syntax issue per se but if I'm unclear I'm probably >> not going to get the syntax style right). >> >> "FROM" makes sense as a work for query and DELETE as information or >> triples is taken from the data but with INSERT, FROM seems odd. > > My understanding was that WITH affected the INSERT/DELETE part, and FROM > the WHERE part. Quite likely that I'm mistaken though! [[ 4.1.3 INSERT/DELETE ... The WITH uri defines the graph that will be modified or matched against for any of the subsequent elements that do not specify a graph explicitly. If not provdided, then the unnamed graph will be assumed. ]] so WHERE as well for WITH. Andy > > - Steve >
Received on Tuesday, 23 March 2010 10:46:34 UTC