W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2010

SPARQL WG Agenda, Tues. Feb. 16

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 23:15:52 -0500
Message-ID: <4B7A1BF8.1060706@thefigtrees.net>
To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Hi everyone,

Sincere apologies for the tardiness of the agenda. Focus will be on 
service description issues and planning how to move everything else 
forward. We'll also look at test suites, again, and discuss the 
alternative aggregate design recently received on the comments mailing list.


Call in details

When joining please don't identify yourself verbally; instead, identify 
yourself to Zakim on IRC

     * Date of Call: Tuesday February 16, 2010
     * Time of Call: 15:00 UK, 10:00 (East US)
     * Dial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge, MA)
     * Dial-In #: + (Nice, France)
     * Dial-In #: +44.117.370.6152 (Bristol, UK)
     * Participant Access Code: 77277# (SPARQ)
     * IRC Channel: irc.w3.org port 6665 channel #sparql 
     * Web-based IRC (member-only): http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc 
(Firefox IRC addon: chatzilla)
     * Duration: 60 minutes
     * Chair: Lee Feigenbaum
     * Scribe: Ivan Herman (Scribe List)
     * Link to Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2010-02-16

[edit] Agenda

     * Admin
           o PROPOSED: Approve minutes at 
           o Next meeting: 2010-02-23 @ 15:00 UK / 10:00 EST (scribe: 
Sandro Hawke)
     * Comment handling - see http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Comments
     * Liaisons - Anything to report?
           o RIF WG (Axel)
           o RDB2RDF WG (Orri)
           o eGov (SteveH)
     * Service Description issues: Greg's summary, in particular:
           o Design of available graphs
           o Support for property functions
           o Any POWDER expertise?
           o http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/43 - does the SD 
support entailment regimes that vary from graph to graph?
                 + Proposal: No.
     * Alternative aggregate design from commenter Emmanuele Della Valle
           o Any volunteers to advocate on behalf of this alternative 
     * Test suite / test cases
           o Looking for next steps & concrete actions here.
     * To Last Call
           o Update (next week?)
           o Protocol (week after?)
           o HTTP Update Protocol
           o Property Paths
           o Query
           o Entailment

[edit] Regrets

     * AndyS
     * Matt Perry

Received on Tuesday, 16 February 2010 04:16:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:01:01 UTC