Re: RIF+SPARQL (was Re: Entailment regimes open issues)

On 2/8/10 10:25 AM, "Birte Glimm" <> wrote:
>> I've expressed interest in the past in helping here and I do know/care about
>> the intersection (personally in the research I do and in how we use SPARQL
>> at the workplace).
> Chime, if  you want to co-edit that section I am happy to introduce
> you to how I handle the problematic cases for RDF(S) and OWL so far.

Certainly.  If it is okay with you and the group.
> It is probably really straightforward, I just don't know RIF enough to
> judge this. OWL Direct Semantics is certainly a bit different and even
> OWL RDF-Based semantics introduces a view more pitfalls (infinite
> answers from owl:TopDataProperty for example). For OWL I am confident
> that I can define these and handle them appropriately. For RIF I would
> consider it a bit risky because I might easily miss some corner cases.

-- Chime


P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

Cleveland Clinic is ranked one of the top hospitals
in America by U.S.News & World Report (2009).  
Visit us online at for
a complete listing of our services, staff and

Confidentiality Note:  This message is intended for use
only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed
and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient or the employee or agent responsible for
delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If
you have received this communication in error,  please
contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in
its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy.  Thank you.

Received on Tuesday, 16 February 2010 14:43:30 UTC