- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>
- Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 09:55:07 +0000
- To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 01/02/2010 9:09 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote: > Summary: > > 1/ Use of ! ex:property meaning anything but that property. This is like inverted character classes in string regex's -- [^abc] meaning anything but "a", "b" or "c". In property paths, IRIs are pattern atoms and the equivalent of characters. --------- Proposal: Add the capability !:property !(:property1|:property2) In particular, the "!" operator only applies to a property or a list of properties, and does not apply to a general path expression (in the same way that [^..] only applies to characters). --------- Discussion point: Continuing with the idea of character classes (property classes - possibly confusing terminology: property sets?), it could be argues that we need the ability to name groups of related IRIs (c.f. \d for digits in strign regexs). The one that I though of is anything starting with a particular namespace IRI - e.g. all foaf: IRIs. Maybe a compact form like: foaf:% or verbose form like: prefix(foaf:) iriPrefix(foaf:) so ?x foaf:% ?y any foaf-related connection. Interacting with !: ?x !rdfs:% ?y Connected by something which isn't in the rdfs: vocabulary. Andy > > # ?x connected to :y but not by having the same type: > ?x !rdf:type ?y . > > # ?x connected to ?y by some path that excludes rdf:type > ?x !( rdf:type | ^rdf:type)* ?y . > > and a follow-on from that, not mentioneded by Doug, would be "any" > property (but not bound to a variable).
Received on Wednesday, 3 February 2010 09:55:13 UTC