- From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 02:53:53 -0500
- To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Hi everyone, I've added some more links to relevant email discussions for the update issues on the wiki page with the agenda. Lee On 2/20/2010 9:23 PM, Lee Feigenbaum wrote: > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2010-02-23 > > We're going to focus on update issues. I'll try to beef up the agenda > with pointers to relevant discussions, but please do look over the > issues and send comments in advance and/or come prepared to discuss. > > Lee > > * Date of Call: Tuesday February 23, 2010 > * Time of Call: 15:00 UK, 10:00 (East US) > * Dial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge, MA) > * Dial-In #: +33.4.89.06.34.99 (Nice, France) > * Dial-In #: +44.117.370.6152 (Bristol, UK) > * Participant Access Code: 77277# (SPARQ) > * IRC Channel: irc.w3.org port 6665 channel #sparql > ([irc:irc.w3.org:6665/sparql]) > * Web-based IRC (member-only): http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc > (Firefox IRC addon: chatzilla) > * Duration: 60 minutes > * Chair: Lee Feigenbaum > * Scribe: Sandro Hawke (Scribe List) > * Link to Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2010-02-23 > > [edit] Agenda > > * Admin > o PROPOSED: Approve minutes at > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-02-16 > o Next meeting: 2010-03-02 @ 15:00 UK / 10:00 EST (scribe: Matthew Perry) > * Comment handling - see http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Comments > * Liaisons - Is there anything to report of relevance to the SPARQL WG? > o RIF WG (Sandro) > o RDB2RDF WG (Orri) > o eGov (Sandro) > * Update - open issues > o Plesae come prepared to offer strong feelings on any of these issues. > Issues without strong feelings will be left to the wisdom of the editor. > o DELETE syntax is ambiguous. should statements be separable with > optional semicolons? Or is another syntax option better? > o ISSUE-20 > + Paul says: Are there differences between an empty graph and a > non-existent graph? I like to think so, but didn't see a consensus. This > issue affects the need for CREATE and DROP graph operations, and > controls whether or not INSERT/DELETE control graph existence. > o Do we have a resolution to the question of whether blank nodes are > permissible in the template for DELETE? > o ISSUE-51 Shall dataset clauses be allowed in SPARQL/Update? > o (Other issues are not demanding of teleconference time at the moment.) > * To Last Call > o Protocol (next week?) > o HTTP Update Protocol > o Property Paths > o Query > o Entailment
Received on Monday, 22 February 2010 07:54:32 UTC