- From: Polleres, Axel <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 08:45:36 -0000
- To: <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: <birte.glimm@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
In my opinion this is a question concerning all entailments from D-entailment "upwards".
----- Original Message -----
From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
To: Polleres, Axel
Cc: Birte Glimm <birte.glimm@comlab.ox.ac.uk>; SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Sent: Fri Mar 05 08:08:10 2010
Subject: Re: [TF-ENT] Condition C2 modifications
On 2010-3-5 24:36 , Axel Polleres wrote:
>
> No objections, but one additional side question:
>
> Do we have an issue with systems that use canonical forms of datatype literals internally?
>
> Say you have:
>
> :s :p "1.000"^^xsd:decimal
>
> is a Datatype-aware system really supposed to return
>
> "1.000"^^xsd:decimal
>
> on { :s :p ?O}
>
> but not it's internal representation?
>
>
This is a good question, I do not know the answer:-(, but is this an
entailment specific question? I would expect that to be a question for
SPARQL as a whole...
Cheers
Ivan
--
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF : http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
vCard : http://www.ivan-herman.net/HermanIvan.vcf
Received on Friday, 5 March 2010 08:46:12 UTC