- From: Polleres, Axel <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 08:45:36 -0000
- To: <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: <birte.glimm@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
In my opinion this is a question concerning all entailments from D-entailment "upwards". ----- Original Message ----- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> To: Polleres, Axel Cc: Birte Glimm <birte.glimm@comlab.ox.ac.uk>; SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org> Sent: Fri Mar 05 08:08:10 2010 Subject: Re: [TF-ENT] Condition C2 modifications On 2010-3-5 24:36 , Axel Polleres wrote: > > No objections, but one additional side question: > > Do we have an issue with systems that use canonical forms of datatype literals internally? > > Say you have: > > :s :p "1.000"^^xsd:decimal > > is a Datatype-aware system really supposed to return > > "1.000"^^xsd:decimal > > on { :s :p ?O} > > but not it's internal representation? > > This is a good question, I do not know the answer:-(, but is this an entailment specific question? I would expect that to be a question for SPARQL as a whole... Cheers Ivan -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF : http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf vCard : http://www.ivan-herman.net/HermanIvan.vcf
Received on Friday, 5 March 2010 08:46:12 UTC