Re: [TF-ENT] Condition C2 modifications

In my opinion this is a question concerning all entailments from D-entailment "upwards".

----- Original Message -----
From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
To: Polleres, Axel
Cc: Birte Glimm <birte.glimm@comlab.ox.ac.uk>; SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Sent: Fri Mar 05 08:08:10 2010
Subject: Re: [TF-ENT] Condition C2 modifications



On 2010-3-5 24:36 , Axel Polleres wrote:
> 
> No objections, but one additional side question: 
> 
> Do we have an issue with systems that use canonical forms of datatype literals internally?
> 
> Say you have:
> 
>  :s :p "1.000"^^xsd:decimal
> 
> is a Datatype-aware system really supposed to return 
> 
>  "1.000"^^xsd:decimal
> 
> on { :s :p ?O} 
> 
> but not it's internal representation?
> 
> 

This is a good question, I do not know the answer:-(, but is this an
entailment specific question? I would expect that to be a question for
SPARQL as a whole...

Cheers

Ivan


-- 

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/

mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html

FOAF   : http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf

vCard  : http://www.ivan-herman.net/HermanIvan.vcf

Received on Friday, 5 March 2010 08:46:12 UTC