- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 17:32:35 +0000
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>
- Cc: "SPARQL Working Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 12 Feb 2010, at 15:05, Andy Seaborne wrote: > > Sec 4.1.4 > > "Note: > The syntax of this operation can be ambiguous when juxtaposed with > INSERT/DELETE. Alternatives are to include an optional semicolon at the > end of each operation, and to change this operation to "DELETE WHERE". > This is under active discussion." indeed it is noted, I was just referring to the curRent grammar which still has the optional WHERE part. > > Sec 4.1.5 discusses short form INSERT but I believe that is not > up-to-date with the discussions. > > "If no WHERE clause is present, then the pattern will be matched in the > same way" yeah, that's out of sync with the grammar which has the WHERE clause obligatory ...you mean that whole sentence should be removed, yes? fine by me, if so. > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JanMar/0163.html > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JanMar/0129.html > > Andy >
Received on Friday, 12 February 2010 17:33:10 UTC