Re: Draft Response to ED-1

This response seems fine to me.

Lee

On 2/11/2010 5:08 AM, Steve Harris wrote:
> c.f.
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Feb/0006.html
>
>
> ---
>
> Emanuele,
>
> Thanks for your comment regarding the SPARQL 1.1 working draft syntax
> for aggregate operations.
>
> The working group did consider an aggregate design similar to the one
> you propose while discussing the various syntax options.
>
> However, the overall opinion of the group was that the familiarity of
> the SQL-style aggregate operations was of a greater benefit than the
> terseness of the syntax.
>
> - Steve Harris, on behalf of the SPARQL WG.
>

Received on Thursday, 11 February 2010 13:55:56 UTC