- From: Chimezie Ogbuji <ogbujic@ccf.org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 12:30:28 -0500
- To: "Axel Polleres" <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- cc: "SPARQL Working Group WG" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>, "Birte Glimm" <birte.glimm@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, "Ivan Herman" <ivan@w3.org>, "Sandro Hawke" <sandro@w3.org>
On 3/10/10 12:58 PM, "Axel Polleres" <axel.polleres@deri.org> wrote: > "The compatibility document defines 3 additional notions of RIF > satisfiability with respect to a combination that builds on simple > entailment: RIF-RDF, RIF-RDFS, and RIF-D satisfiability." > > I's suggest to mention RIF-simple satisfiability, explicitly, before. I've reworded that part to better explain how the RIF-simple model theory is the basis for the other 3 and emphasized that entailment regime is only for simple entailment (it is now called Simple RIF Core). > "For the purpose of this entailment regime, we will only define > answers with respect to those RDF graphs that are RIF-RDF satisfiable > and RIF-RDF-entailed by the combination formed from the scoping graph > and a referenced, strongly safe RIF-Core [RIF-Core] document." > > why not RIF-simple? See above > --- > > "Any legal RDF graph. RDF graphs that do not have a statement with a > predicate of rif-rdf:usesRuleset will not be applicable to this > entailment regime" > I find this too strong. It seems to preclude to use e.g. an RDF stroe > which has some default Ruleset, it uses. > Can we get around this? I'm not sure how else you can be explicit about the ruleset that will be used to form the combination. > ------ > > "well-formed RDF triples that are RIF-RDF-entailed by the RIF-RDF > combination formed from SG and the strongly safe RIF core documents > referenced from SG via the rif-rdf:usesRuleset predicate." > > this seems to include all the RDF axiomatic triples! so possibly > infinite answers, unless you meant to use s/RIF-RDF/RIF-simple/g in > all the above said. Yes, this has all been changed to use RIF simple, so conditions that limit the solutions to terms in a vocabulary to ensure finiteness are no longer needed (in the case of combinations with a strongly safe RIF core document). > However, I think we could - quite easily - extend that to RIF-RDF and > RIF-RDFS alalogoosly as we do it for the RDF and RDFS entailment regimes! I'm planning on adding an informative section on how the mechanisms such as the embeddings in the RIF-RDF compatibility document can be used to build other RIF Core entailment regimes that coincide with (finite) RDF, RDFS, and OWL2-RL entailment. -- Chime =================================== P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail Cleveland Clinic is ranked one of the top hospitals in America by U.S.News & World Report (2009). Visit us online at http://www.clevelandclinic.org for a complete listing of our services, staff and locations. Confidentiality Note: This message is intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy. Thank you.
Received on Thursday, 11 March 2010 17:51:13 UTC