- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 09:46:44 +0000
- To: Paul Gearon <gearon@ieee.org>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
The work was done by several of us (DanBri, Libby ...) then adopted by DAWG (Steve, Lee, Jeen), Eric added annotation support for noting intersting facts and the rdf:type got added (syntax test, bad synatx test, query test). mf:entries ( [ mf:name "Path-01" ; rdf:type mfx:TestQuery ; mf:action [ qt:query <path-01.arq> ; qt:data <data-1.ttl> ] ; mf:result <path-01.srx> ] .... The structure of tests needs tweaking but it is basically there: action-result, where the action has query-specific vocab for dataset description and the query itself. What could work for update is the same overall theme: graph store - update script - result where the result is an NQuads file (lowest implementation cost). The dataset description would work for a graph store, I think, including empty graphs (with care). You can get to all the scripted test via: http://jena.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/jena/ARQ/trunk/testing/ARQ/ but there isn't scripted support for update. Andy On 16/02/2010 4:26 PM, Paul Gearon wrote: > Hi Andy, > > The vocabulary used for tests in SPARQL 1.0 is not sufficient to > handle tests on SPARQL 1.1 Update. Since a lot of the work is based on > work done in Jena, we were wondering if Jena has a vocabulary and > framework suitable for testing Updates? If this exists, could you give > me some pointers to it please? > > Thanks in advance. > > Regards, > Paul Gearon
Received on Monday, 22 February 2010 09:47:15 UTC