- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 14:40:23 +0000
- To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 5 January 2010 14:40:57 UTC
I am still catching up with Entailment and didn't complete the whole review in time... ... so, attached part 1, which essentially goes up to RDFS entailment only, didn't have time yet to take a closer look to the OWL parts. None of my comments should really hold up publication, I think the document is overall in very good shape. However, actually some of my questions (comment 6) and 9) ) refer to the definitions taken from the current query spec and might need further rethinking/discussion of those. Details in the attached file.
Received on Tuesday, 5 January 2010 14:40:57 UTC