- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>
- Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 13:32:44 +0000
- To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Meta-comment: This style of analysis-proposals works very well for me and we also get the details more easily found in the archive. Lee - Thank you Andy On 03/03/2010 6:16 AM, Lee Feigenbaum wrote: > This email is in reference to > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/actions/201 . It summarizes the > discussion of blank nodes in DELETE and concludes with what I see as two > reasonable proposals. Skip to the end if all you are interested in are > the proposals. > > == The Problem == > == Background == > == The Proposals == > == My Opinion ==
Received on Wednesday, 3 March 2010 13:33:11 UTC