- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 15:36:23 +0000
- To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Draft response for comment N3-1 http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:N3-1 Sandro - there is the specific issue of expressions. As property paths already use * and + for their natural regex meaning, expressions might well need to be delimited anyway. It is a balance of what is the best use of the undelimited form and delimited forms in the overall syntax, together with design style and parser complexity. We could add something like: """ In N3Alternatives#Syntax there is discussion of including expressions in N3. Property paths already use * and + for their regex meanings. Adding expressions as well overloads several characters so possibly requiring syntax to delimit an expression. """ Andy
Received on Wednesday, 10 February 2010 15:36:55 UTC