- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>
- Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 09:18:38 +0000
- To: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 08/02/2010 8:09 AM, Axel Polleres wrote:
> • Any updates on F2F3?
> • Query Issues:
> • Andy's Summary
> • Discussion on issue-29
> • Discussion on issue-35
> • Test suite / test cases
> • On the deck:
> • SD issues: Greg's summary
> • ENT issues: Birte's summary
We could try to close some of these issues which Steve and I picked out
as having consensus as far as we knew.
We won't do all of them but we could try for 3,4,12,36
ISSUE-3
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/3
ISSUE-4
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/4
ISSUE-12
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/12
ISSUE-36
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/36
Andy
More complete list from the emails:
> ISSUE-3
> Subquery syntax (e.g. mandatory curly braces
> DONE - use {}
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/3
> Subquery syntax (e.g. mandatory curly braces)
> - I've not heard anyone speaking against braces recently.
> ISSUE-4
> What is the variable scope between main queries and subqueries
> DONE - join scoping subject to projection.
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/4
> What is the variable scope between main queries and subqueries?
> - Only projected variables have scope outside a subquery.
> ISSUE-8
> What determines the RDF dataset for subqueries?
> DONE - Same as outer query - no FROM in subqueries.
> ISSUE-12
> Presence and syntactic detail of HAVING clause
> DONE (it's like a FILTER with the word HAVING)
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/12
> Presence and syntactic detail of HAVING clause
> - Seems consensus on the post-aggregate FILTER being called.
> ISSUE-36
> What happens when expressions are projected with the same name as an
> existing variable?
> DONE Current doc proposes this is a static error.
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/36
> What happens when expressions are projected with the same name as an
> existing variable?
> - Seems consensus on it being an error.
> ISSUE-39
> Can variable used as aliases for expressions be themselves used in other
> expressions?
> DONE
> Scope starts at point of definition - can use to the right and outer
scope.
Received on Tuesday, 9 February 2010 09:19:10 UTC