- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>
- Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 09:18:38 +0000
- To: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 08/02/2010 8:09 AM, Axel Polleres wrote: > • Any updates on F2F3? > • Query Issues: > • Andy's Summary > • Discussion on issue-29 > • Discussion on issue-35 > • Test suite / test cases > • On the deck: > • SD issues: Greg's summary > • ENT issues: Birte's summary We could try to close some of these issues which Steve and I picked out as having consensus as far as we knew. We won't do all of them but we could try for 3,4,12,36 ISSUE-3 http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/3 ISSUE-4 http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/4 ISSUE-12 http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/12 ISSUE-36 http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/36 Andy More complete list from the emails: > ISSUE-3 > Subquery syntax (e.g. mandatory curly braces > DONE - use {} > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/3 > Subquery syntax (e.g. mandatory curly braces) > - I've not heard anyone speaking against braces recently. > ISSUE-4 > What is the variable scope between main queries and subqueries > DONE - join scoping subject to projection. > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/4 > What is the variable scope between main queries and subqueries? > - Only projected variables have scope outside a subquery. > ISSUE-8 > What determines the RDF dataset for subqueries? > DONE - Same as outer query - no FROM in subqueries. > ISSUE-12 > Presence and syntactic detail of HAVING clause > DONE (it's like a FILTER with the word HAVING) > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/12 > Presence and syntactic detail of HAVING clause > - Seems consensus on the post-aggregate FILTER being called. > ISSUE-36 > What happens when expressions are projected with the same name as an > existing variable? > DONE Current doc proposes this is a static error. > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/36 > What happens when expressions are projected with the same name as an > existing variable? > - Seems consensus on it being an error. > ISSUE-39 > Can variable used as aliases for expressions be themselves used in other > expressions? > DONE > Scope starts at point of definition - can use to the right and outer scope.
Received on Tuesday, 9 February 2010 09:19:10 UTC