W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2010

Re: Update

From: Paul Gearon <gearon@ieee.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 10:08:03 -0500
Message-ID: <a25ac1f1001190708u1c038200u757285c845112ac8@mail.gmail.com>
To: Olivier Corby <Olivier.Corby@sophia.inria.fr>
Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Olivier Corby
<Olivier.Corby@sophia.inria.fr> wrote:
> A question and a typo about the update document.
> "The GRAPH <uri> clause in a graph_template names the graph in the graph
> store to be
> updated; if omitted, the directive applies to the graph specified by the
> WITH clause, or the unnamed graph if no WITH clause is present."
> Question:
> In a graph_template, what about GRAPH ?g if ?g is not bound, does the WITH
> clause applies to GRAPH ?g  ?

I presume that it applies to all graphs. I suppose it looks like FROM
or FROM NAMED, but I've been thinking of it as specifying a fallback
value when none is supplied.

> 4.1.7 CLEAR
> typo:
> If the GRAPH is not specified then this will clear the default *graph.i*

Oops. My editor choice is showing.  :-)  (Fixed)

Received on Tuesday, 19 January 2010 15:08:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:01:01 UTC