Re: Outstanding response to Leigh Dodds

In general I think that if there is no objection to the reply within,
say, a week, then we should allow the mail to be sent...

I am not sure we agreed with this policy, though

Ivan

On 2010-1-28 22:19 , Chimezie Ogbuji wrote:
> I wasn't in the last telecon where we went over outstanding comments, but I
> noticed that I have yet to respond to Leigh Dodds comment on the HTTP
> protocol WD.  I don't remember if the WG had given a thumbs up to my
> response in the end (I incorporated many of the changes in that comment, in
> any case).  If so, I can go ahead and respond to him.
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:ldodds-http-update
> 
> -- Chime
> 
> 
> ===================================
> 
> P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
> 
> Cleveland Clinic is ranked one of the top hospitals
> in America by U.S.News & World Report (2009).  
> Visit us online at http://www.clevelandclinic.org for
> a complete listing of our services, staff and
> locations.
> 
> 
> Confidentiality Note:  This message is intended for use
> only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed
> and may contain information that is privileged,
> confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable
> law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended
> recipient or the employee or agent responsible for
> delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are
> hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
> copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If
> you have received this communication in error,  please
> contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in
> its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy.  Thank you.
> 
> 

-- 

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF   : http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
vCard  : http://www.ivan-herman.net/HermanIvan.vcf