- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:34:46 -0500
- To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Hi Axel, I still have some issues for some documents. Note that the pubrules checker is ok for all of them. > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/gen.html > There are broken links and broken fragments. > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/update-1.1/gen.html > There are broken fragments. > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/protocol-1.1/gen.html > There are broken fragments. > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/service-description-1.1/gen.html > This one is ok. > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/http-rdf-update/Overview.html > This one is ok. > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/entailment/gen.html > There are broken links and broken fragments. I would suggest you to not point to fragments while using a Latest Version URL that is not a Recommendation, as it can be broken at anytime. For example: http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query//#rdfDataset . Use a dated URL instead./ > Moreover, we resolved [7] to publish one additional FPWD (the shortname approval is in the end of this mail), current location: > > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/property-paths/gen.html > There are broken fragments. Alexandre.
Received on Tuesday, 26 January 2010 15:34:48 UTC