- From: Richard Newman <rnewman@twinql.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 18:48:14 -0800
- To: Paul Gearon <gearon@ieee.org>
- Cc: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
>> While my question was for clarification, not an action, just today a >> customer asked "how can I find out how many triples were deleted by >> this API >> call?". >> >> Without saying either way that the spec should mandate a particular >> response, I think it's very likely that customers will ask for, and >> implementations will provide, a useful response to an Update request. > > While I can definitely see the use here, I'd push very hard to make > responses like this OPTIONAL. It would be a cost on our system, though > I can't comment on others. Absolutely -- I realize re-reading that my message seemed like "I wasn't proposing an action, but now I am", but I actually intended nothing more than a note. I was simply remarking on the coincidence and the nature of customers :)
Received on Friday, 15 January 2010 02:48:43 UTC