RE: VOTE: PROV-DM Identifiers (deadline Wednesday 29/02, midnight GMT)
prov-wg: agenda Mar. 1, 2012
PROV-ISSUE-275 (TLebo): Not all prov:Bundles are sd:NamedGraphs [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o]
ProvRDF: new mapping markup
Slides on PROV-AQ
PROV-ISSUE-274 (wd4-feedback): feedback on WD4 [prov-dm]
PROV-ISSUE-273 (name-for-asn): what name for the provenance notation [prov-dm]
PROV-ISSUE-272 (TLebo): PROV examples collection
PROV-ISSUE-271 (TLebo): PROV examples collection
Collecting PROV examples
- Re: Collecting PROV examples
- Re: Collecting PROV examples
- Re: Collecting PROV examples
- Re: Collecting PROV examples
- Re: Collecting PROV examples
- Re: Collecting PROV examples
PROV-ISSUE-270 (TLebo): automate HTML for OWL constructs [Ontology]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-270 (TLebo): automate HTML for OWL constructs [Ontology]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-270 (TLebo): automate HTML for OWL constructs [Ontology]
producing HTML documentation of RDFS/OWL
prov-o meeting today
PROV-ISSUE-269: involved property need to be renamed and its sup-properties need to be structured in a better manner
prov-wg meeting minutes 2012-02-23
New prov-o ontology!
Feedback about DM draft 4
PROV-ISSUE-268 (two-level-ontology): Two Level Ontology? [Ontology]
- RE: PROV-ISSUE-268 (two-level-ontology): Two Level Ontology? [Ontology]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-268 (two-level-ontology): Two Level Ontology? [Ontology]
prov-o agenda
PROV-ISSUE-267 (TLebo): annotate all subproperty axioms to justify them [Ontology]
Provenance model, syntax and formal properties
PROV-ISSUE-266 (TLebo): RL, why? [Ontology]
PROV-ISSUE-265 (TLebo): RL, why? [Ontology]
PROV-ISSUE-264 (TLebo): citing an Involvement and not a more specific Involvement. [Ontology]
resurrecting prov-o components design
Re: PROV-ISSUE-216 (TLebo): qualified wasAttributedTo? [prov-dm]
VOTE: PROV-DM Identifiers (deadline Wednesday 29/02, midnight GMT)
- Re: VOTE: PROV-DM Identifiers (deadline Wednesday 29/02, midnight GMT)
- Re: VOTE: PROV-DM Identifiers (deadline Wednesday 29/02, midnight GMT)
Action-61: PROV-SEM synchronized to WD3; please review
prov-wg: F2F2 Meeting Minutes
Primer update
Comments on PROV-O
Review of DM WD4
Review of PROV-DM (WD4) up to section 5
nice reference for qualified
[prov-o] involvementClass property
[prov-o] Start vs. StartByActivity
[prov-o] How to express Involvement as as an "Abstract" class in OWL
- Re: [prov-o] How to express Involvement as as an "Abstract" class in OWL
- Re: [prov-o] How to express Involvement as as an "Abstract" class in OWL
Prov-wg - Minutes of 16 Feb 2012 Telecon
reviewer feedback on prov-o ontology
PROV-ISSUE-263 (implicit-subject-problem): Implicit subject in Involvement causes mis-alignment [Ontology]
PROV-DM Simplication Reviewer Feedback...
PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 23 Feb 2012
PROV-ISSUE-262 (qualifier-property): entity used entity? [Ontology]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-262 (qualifier-property): entity used entity? [Ontology]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-262 (qualifier-property): entity used entity? [Ontology]
PROV-ISSUE-261 (TLebo): alternateOf is not owl:sameAs (rephrase definition) [prov-dm]
PROV-ISSUE-260 (TLebo): In Note section: cite prov:Provenance as better practice to annotate assertions. [prov-dm]
PROV-ISSUE-259: hadTemporalExtent domain and range [Ontology]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-259: hadTemporalExtent domain and range [Ontology]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-259: hadTemporalExtent domain and range [Ontology]
PROV-ISSUE-258 (TLebo): consolidate Association / Responsibility / Affiliation [prov-dm]
PROV-ISSUE-257 (TLebo): rename "Account"/"Bundle"/"AccountEntity" to "Provenance" [prov-dm]
Re: PROV-ISSUE-138 (collection-collision): Collection does not describe multiple additions/replacements [Data Model]
Re: PROV-ISSUE-137 (collection-isolation): Collection assertions does not guarantee isolation [Data Model]
Re: PROV-ISSUE-136 (collection-functional): Collection not stated as functional [Data Model]
Re: PROV-ISSUE-135 (collection-names): Collection relations have confusing names [Data Model], ISSUE-137,
Re: PROV-ISSUE-139 (collection-emptylist): Collections don't provide a way to specify empty lists [Data Model]
Collections in PROV-O
prov-o review / comments
Making PROV-O OWL-RL compliant
prov-wg: Report on HCLS call
Re: Tim's approach on Involvement
- Re: Tim's approach on Involvement
- Re: Tim's approach on Involvement
- Re: Tim's approach on Involvement
- Re: Tim's approach on Involvement
- Re: Tim's approach on Involvement
PROV-ISSUE-256 (TLebo): change namespace of prov-o
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-256 (TLebo): change namespace of prov-o
PROV-ISSUE-255 (TLebo): rename ALL hadQualifiedXXX to simply prov:qualified
PROV-ISSUE-254 (TLebo): rename QualifiedInvolement to Involvement [Ontology]
PROV-O call (Feb 20)
survey on (linked) data quality on the web
Comments to the working draft 4 of DM
- Re: Comments to the working draft 4 of DM
- Re: Comments to the working draft 4 of DM
- Re: Comments to the working draft 4 of DM
Updated PROV-O OWL and ProvRDF wiki page
use case agent
rdf mapping of example in prov-dm example
2nd CFP: 4th Intl. Provenance and Annotation Workshop (IPAW'2012)
ACTION-55 is reopened
PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o]
quick updates of the ontology
Re: PROV-ISSUE-105: 5.3.1 Generation (current version of the conceptual model document) [Conceptual Model]
ACTION-56: ProvRDF mappings ready for review
The Quality of Linked Data (with an emphasis on drug discovery)
prov-wg: Another name for Qualified?
- Re: prov-wg: Another name for Qualified?
- Re: prov-wg: Another name for Qualified?
- Re: prov-wg: Another name for Qualified?
- Re: prov-wg: Another name for Qualified?
PROV-O is currently within OWL-DL can we make OWL-RL?
Primer actions
PROV-O ontology comments
Re: PROV-DM Simplification
ISSUE-135 ... ISSUE-139
Re: PROV-ISSUE-200: Section 6.3 (PROV-DM as on Dec 5) [prov-dm]
Re: PROV-ISSUE-193: Section 5.3.2.2 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm]
Re: PROV-ISSUE-192: Section 5.3.2.1 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm]
Update on PROV-O OWL file (Action item 55)
- Re: Update on PROV-O OWL file (Action item 55)
PROV-ISSUE-252 (TLebo): Examples for prescribed prov attributes location and time [prov-dm]
PROV-ISSUE-251 (TLebo): put "location" attribute into prov: prefix [prov-dm]
Prov-wg: Telecon agenda Feb 16, 2012
bootstrapping testcases for prov
closing issues
PROV-O call on Feb 13
quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping
- Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping
- Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping
Re: PROV-ISSUE-189: Section 5.2.4 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm]
Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm]
- RE: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm]
Re: PROV-ISSUE-187: Section 5.2.2 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-187: Section 5.2.2 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-187: Section 5.2.2 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-187: Section 5.2.2 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm]
Re: PROV-ISSUE-186: Section 5.2.1 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm]
Re: PROV-ISSUE-185: Section 3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm]
Scruffy vs proper (was: PROV-ISSUE-249 (two-derivations): Why do we have 3 derivations? [prov-dm])
prov-o team to list left hand sides of DM mapping rules
PROV-ISSUE-250 (TLebo): respond to Eric's comments [Ontology]
PROV-O Review Comments to Sections 1 - 3.1.6
PROV-ISSUE-249 (two-derivations): Why do we have 3 derivations? [prov-dm]
PROV-ISSUE-248 (string-as-entity): How to model strings? [Formal Semantics]
scribe required
blog post on third working draft of the prov-dm
PROV-ISSUE-247: Regarding Collections in prov-dm [prov-dm]
F2F chat log online?
Connection Task Force Meeting Monday Feb 13
PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 9 Feb 2012
Prov presentation for HCLS Sci Discourse Task Force
PROV-ISSUE-246 (TLebo): add plan example: web page tutorial [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-246 (TLebo): add plan example: web page tutorial [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-246 (TLebo): add plan example: web page tutorial [prov-dm]
PROV-ISSUE-245 (TLebo): entity was used -> __started__ to be used
PROV-ISSUE-244 (TLebo): wasGeneratedBy(x,a,attrs,t) transposed arguments
PROV-ISSUE-243 (TLebo): how to interpret ASN assertions with incomplete arity?
PROV-ISSUE-242 (TLebo): generated twice? [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-242 (TLebo): generated twice? [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-242 (TLebo): generated twice? [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-242 (TLebo): generated twice? [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-242 (TLebo): generated twice? [prov-dm]
PROV-ISSUE-241 (TLebo): remove ex:order=2 in generation example
PROV-ISSUE-240 (TLebo): highlight optionals in wasGeneratedBy([id],e,a,[t],[attrs]) [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-240 (TLebo): highlight optionals in wasGeneratedBy([id],e,a,[t],[attrs]) [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-240 (TLebo): highlight optionals in wasGeneratedBy([id],e,a,[t],[attrs]) [prov-dm]
PROV-ISSUE-239 (TLebo): is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful? [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-239 (TLebo): is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful? [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-239 (TLebo): is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful? [prov-dm]
PROV-ISSUE-238 (TLebo): order relation sections to suit a natural traversal of the Relation table [prov-dm]
PROV-ISSUE-237 (TLebo): Rename Relation to Involvement [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-237 (TLebo): Rename Relation to Involvement [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-237 (TLebo): Rename Relation to Involvement [prov-dm]
PROV-ISSUE-236 (TLebo): rendered provenance is a thing in the world [prov-dm]
PROV-O call (Feb 6)
Update Connection TF
PROV-ISSUE-235 (TLebo): add MAY to namespace defining "schema" [prov-dm]
more fuel for the thing vs. entity fire
PROV-ISSUE-234 (TLebo): id identifies entity, not the record [prov-dm]
PROV-ISSUE-233 (paq-dm-and-accounts?): If not in DM, should there be some form of account support in the paq? [Accessing and Querying Provenance]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-233 (paq-dm-and-accounts?): If not in DM, should there be some form of account support in the paq? [Accessing and Querying Provenance]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-233 (paq-dm-and-accounts?): If not in DM, should there be some form of account support in the paq? [Accessing and Querying Provenance]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-233 (paq-dm-and-accounts?): If not in DM, should there be some form of account support in the paq? [Accessing and Querying Provenance]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-233 (paq-dm-and-accounts?): If not in DM, should there be some form of account support in the paq? [Accessing and Querying Provenance]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-233 (paq-dm-and-accounts?): If not in DM, should there be some form of account support in the paq? [Accessing and Querying Provenance]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-233 (paq-dm-and-accounts?): If not in DM, should there be some form of account support in the paq? [Accessing and Querying Provenance]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-233 (paq-dm-and-accounts?): If not in DM, should there be some form of account support in the paq? [Accessing and Querying Provenance]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-233 (paq-dm-and-accounts?): If not in DM, should there be some form of account support in the paq? [Accessing and Querying Provenance]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-233 (paq-dm-and-accounts?): If not in DM, should there be some form of account support in the paq? [Accessing and Querying Provenance]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-233 (paq-dm-and-accounts?): If not in DM, should there be some form of account support in the paq? [Accessing and Querying Provenance]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-233 (paq-dm-and-accounts?): If not in DM, should there be some form of account support in the paq? [Accessing and Querying Provenance]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-233 (paq-dm-and-accounts?): If not in DM, should there be some form of account support in the paq? [Accessing and Querying Provenance]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-233 (paq-dm-and-accounts?): If not in DM, should there be some form of account support in the paq? [Accessing and Querying Provenance]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-233 (paq-dm-and-accounts?): If not in DM, should there be some form of account support in the paq? [Accessing and Querying Provenance]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-233 (paq-dm-and-accounts?): If not in DM, should there be some form of account support in the paq? [Accessing and Querying Provenance]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-233 (paq-dm-and-accounts?): If not in DM, should there be some form of account support in the paq? [Accessing and Querying Provenance]