W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > February 2012

Re: Provenance model, syntax and formal properties

From: Jim McCusker <mccusj@rpi.edu>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 18:06:49 +0000
Message-ID: <CAAtgn=SxGto3Krorf3eQ6wYe+NcWWYj2LVuhO3xrsSwc6wnCgw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Cc: Graham Klyne <graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk>, W3C provenance WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 6:26 AM, Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>wrote:

> Hi Graham
> A quick answer to two of your points;
> - the ASN acronym has been bothering me for a while.
>  Indeed, it's a notation, not an abstract syntax.
>  I am open to suggestion, I suggest I raise an issue to debate the name.

Feel free to take credit/raise the issue, but how about Provenance Notation
(PROV-N)? Since it's parseable and inter-convertable, it's not abstract.
It's just a domain-specific language for provenance.

Jim McCusker
Programmer Analyst
Krauthammer Lab, Pathology Informatics
Yale School of Medicine
james.mccusker@yale.edu | (203) 785-6330

PhD Student
Tetherless World Constellation
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Received on Tuesday, 28 February 2012 18:07:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:08 UTC