- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 10:08:41 -0500
- To: Curt Tilmes <Curt.Tilmes@nasa.gov>
- Cc: <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Added example to http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/PROV_OWL_ontology_component_examples#The_MonaLisa_portrait_is_dated_to_circa_1503.E2.80.931519 -tim On Feb 17, 2012, at 9:25 AM, Curt Tilmes wrote: > On 02/16/2012 05:04 PM, Luc Moreau wrote: >> On 16/02/12 21:36, Satya Sahoo wrote: >>> Also, I believe the DM supports representation of a simple provenance >>> assertion such as, "The MonaLisa portrait is dated to circa 1503–1519" >>> (MonaLisa portrait is an Entity). >> >> How would you do it? I don't know. > > Time is instantaneous, so you couldn't specify it as a generation > time, but could you just define a domain specific attribute for the > generation? > > wasGeneratedBy(ex:MonaLisa, [ex:creationEstimate="1503-1519"]); > > Is it ok to leave out both activity and time in order to specify > generation attributes? DM would seem to allow it since everything but > entity is optional. > > > How would such a thing get mapped to RDF? > > ex:MonaLisa a prov:Entity . > _:a a prov:Activity . > _:g a prov:Generation . > ex:MonaLisa prov:wasGeneratedBy _:a . > _:a prov:hadQualifiedGeneration _:g . > _:g a prov:QualifiedInvolvement . > _:g prov:hadQualifiedEntity ex:MonaLisa . > _:g ex:creationEstimate "1503-1519" . > > > Probably easier to just express this outside PROV: > > ex:MonaLisa ex:creationEstimate "1503-1519" . > > Curt > >
Received on Friday, 17 February 2012 15:09:12 UTC