- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 09:38:22 -0500
- To: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- Cc: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Sounds harmless enough. Did you put it into the latest ontology? I fired up protege and didn't see it. -Tim On Feb 23, 2012, at 7:14 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > I've suggest a new annotation property in the OWL file: prov:involvementClass. > > > + <owl:AnnotationProperty > rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#involvementClass"> > + <rdfs:label xml:lang="en">involvement class</rdfs:label> > + <rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">This annotation property links a > prov:involved subproperty with a prov:Involved subclass. This > indicates that the property can be qualified by using prov:qualified. > + > +Example: > + prov:wasGeneratedBy prov:involvementClass prov:Generation . > + > +Then this unqualified assertion: > + :entity1 prov:wasGeneratedBy :activity1 . > + > +can be qualified by adding: > + :entity1 prov:qualified :entity1Gen . > + :entity1Gen a prov:Generation; > + prov:activity :activity1 ; > + :customValue 1337 . > + > +Note how the range of the unqualified property is mirrored by the > prov:activity or prov:entity on the involvement class.</rdfs:comment> > + <rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="&rdfs;seeAlso"/> > + </owl:AnnotationProperty> > > > and added this to each of the involved subproperties. (but not > prov:involved itself - as you should instantiate prov:involved and > prov:Involvement alone) > > > > -- > Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team > School of Computer Science > The University of Manchester > >
Received on Thursday, 23 February 2012 14:39:02 UTC