Re: Tim's approach on Involvement

On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:46, Khalid Belhajjame
<Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk> wrote:


> We decided to model only wasStartedBy that involves an agent. So that I
> think, we can safely define Start as a sub-class of Association.

So something like in http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF#Starting_again ?

I'm not sure if I like this - here the involvement is both a
prov:Start and prov:Inform at the same time - and a phantom agent ?ag1
is introduced.

.. or we simply say that Starting_again is not mapped to RDF?

-- 
Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team
School of Computer Science
The University of Manchester

Received on Wednesday, 22 February 2012 09:02:50 UTC