Re: Tim's approach on Involvement

On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:51, Khalid Belhajjame
<Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk> wrote:

> Do you mean that we may have an instance of EntityInvolvement  that does not
> denote an agent association and in which the entity involved happens to be
> an agent? For example, an activity that used as input an agent?

Yes, of course, it's an entity.

Example - the :photographing activity prov:used :me - even if :me is a
prov:Person.

I might or might not have been the agent associated with the activity.

http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/PROV_OWL_ontology_component_examples#Self_portrait


-- 
Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team
School of Computer Science
The University of Manchester

Received on Tuesday, 21 February 2012 11:30:14 UTC