Re: prov-o team to list left hand sides of DM mapping rules

Thank you, Daniel.

I look forward to reviewing what you've done.

I know you've also created the lists

http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF#List_of_terms_that_are_going_to_be_modeled_in_order_to_align_PROV-O_to_WD3
http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF#List_of_terms_that_are_NOT_going_to_be_modeled_in_PROV-O_to_WD3__alignement

Can you move each classification here down next to the rule?

So, instead of saying "We won't do wasEndedBy and Account", this rule page will have that mentioned in each section:

== Account ===

DM => PROVO

We will not do this mapping yet.

== wasEndedBy ===

DM => PROVO

We will not do this mapping yet.



I think it's best if we stay DM-centric so that we can stay oriented.

Also, I'd like to get rid of the lists at the top when their information has made it to the appropriate sections.

Thanks,
Tim


On Feb 10, 2012, at 10:50 AM, Daniel Garijo wrote:

> Hi Tim,
> I've completed the left list (in order), and I've also completed the actedOnBehalfOf according
> to what was discussed on the mailing list.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Daniel
> 
> 2012/2/10 Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
> prov-o team,
> 
> We agreed to have a complete list of "left hand sides" listed at [1] by today.
> 
> It is still incomplete.
> 
> This is mostly a copy-paste activity. The heavy lifting comes in filling in the right hand sides.
> 
> The purpose of our goal today was to extract _all_ of the DM ASN signatures so that we had a concise view of the work ahead of us.
> I've argued before (and heard some agreement) that we maintain the order of the rules to suit the original order in the DM.
> 
> I have about 10 done, and I think someone did the Derivation.
> 
> Can we get more eyes on copy/pasting the signatures from DM into left hand sides of these rules?
> 
> If the pattern is not obvious from the 11 rules that are already there, please ask for clarification.
> 
> 
> I will work on the list this afternoon, but won't be able to get back to it until Sunday afternoon.
> 
> Thanks for your consideration.
> 
> Regards,
> Tim
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [1]  http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF
>