RE: VOTE: PROV-DM Identifiers (deadline Wednesday 29/02, midnight GMT)

+1

Sent from my Samsung smartphone on AT&T

"Miles, Simon" <simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk> wrote:

>+1
>
>Dr Simon Miles
>Lecturer, Department of Computer Science
>Kings College London, WC2R 2LS, UK
>+44 (0)20 7848 1166
>
>Determining the trustworthiness of new electronic contracts:
>http://eprints.dcs.kcl.ac.uk/1341/
>________________________________________
>From: Khalid Belhajjame [Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk]
>Sent: 29 February 2012 10:32
>To: Luc Moreau
>Cc: Provenance Working Group
>Subject: Re: VOTE: PROV-DM Identifiers (deadline Wednesday 29/02, midnight   GMT)
>
>+1
>Makes sense to me.
>khalid
>
>On 28/02/2012 20:46, Luc Moreau wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> Kind reminder for a vote.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Professor Luc Moreau
>> Electronics and Computer Science
>> University of Southampton
>> Southampton SO17 1BJ
>> United Kingdom
>>
>> On 24 Feb 2012, at 00:21, "Luc Moreau"<L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>  wrote:
>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> Today, we have agreed [1] to reorganize the PROV-DM deliverable in three separate documents:
>>>
>>> PROV-DM: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm.html
>>> PROV-DM-CONSTRAINTS: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm-constraints.html
>>> PROV-ASN: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-asn.html
>>>
>>> As part of the reorganization, we dropped the notion of 'record', the notion of 'account record', the
>>> idea of 'nested account records', and associated idea of scope, in the spirit of simplification discussed
>>> at F2F2.
>>>
>>> Given this, we propose to close all issues related to identifiers, namely:
>>>
>>> - ISSUE-145,
>>> - ISSUE-183,
>>> - ISSUE-215,
>>> - ISSUE-225 and
>>> - ISSUE-234
>>>
>>> Can you express your support in the usual way, or continue the discussion for the respective issues.
>>> (Please cast a vote for each issue).
>>>
>>> Deadline: deadline Wednesday 29/02, midnight GMT
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Luc
>>>
>>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/meeting/2012-02-23#resolution_2
>>

Received on Wednesday, 29 February 2012 22:45:11 UTC