- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 20:46:52 -0500
- To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: public-prov-wg@w3.org
On Feb 23, 2012, at 6:33 PM, Luc Moreau wrote: > Hi Tim, > > Would you be ok with > > "The purpose of this section is to introduce relations between two entities that refer a common, more abstract thing in the world" Yes, I would be ok with that. > > > I don't think that entities *describe* a thing. I'm indifferent on this, but I think you'd say that entities characterize things, which I'd consider to be a description. (Don't want to open the Entity versus Thing thing again here). -Tim > Thoughts? > > Luc > > On 22/02/12 18:34, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >> PROV-ISSUE-261 (TLebo): alternateOf is not owl:sameAs (rephrase definition) [prov-dm] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/261 >> >> Raised by: Timothy Lebo >> On product: prov-dm >> >> The following could be reasonably interpreted as owl:sameAs, which prov:alternateOf is _not_: >> >> "The purpose of this section is to introduce relations between two entities that refer to the same thing in the world" >> >> propose to rephrase to: >> >> "The purpose of this section is to introduce relations between two entities that describe a common, more abstract thing in the world." >> >> Thanks, >> Tim >> >> >> >> > >
Received on Friday, 24 February 2012 01:47:24 UTC