- From: Simon Miles <simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 11:51:30 +0000
- To: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Hello PROV-O and PROV-DM authors, I'd like your opinion on where the significant gaps lie between the primer and the other documents for the coming release. >From my reading of the ontology, I see the following need updating: - wasControlledBy in the primer needs to be replaced by wasAssociatedWith, wasStartedBy and wasEndedBy - old wasDerivedFrom and wasEventuallyDerivedFrom need to be replaced with new wasDerivedFrom and tracedTo and the following are not present in the primer at all: - actedOnBehalfOf - adoptedPlan - alternateOf and specializationOf - endedAt, startedAt, wasGeneratedAt - hadLocation - hadOriginalSource, wasQuotedFrom, wasSummaryOf - hasAnnotation - wasInformedBy Which of these are uncontroversial and critical enough that they should be included in the next primer draft? thanks, Simon Dr Simon Miles Lecturer, Department of Computer Science Kings College London, WC2R 2LS, UK +44 (0)20 7848 1166 Modelling the Provenance of Data in Autonomous Systems: http://eprints.dcs.kcl.ac.uk/1264/ -- Dr Simon Miles Lecturer, Department of Informatics Kings College London, WC2R 2LS, UK +44 (0)20 7848 1166 Efficient Multi-Granularity Service Composition: http://eprints.dcs.kcl.ac.uk/1396/
Received on Thursday, 16 February 2012 11:52:01 UTC