Re: Tim's approach on Involvement from Khalid Belhajjame on 2012-02-21 (public-prov-wg@w3.org from February 2012)

From: Khalid Belhajjame <Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 11:46:48 +0000
To: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
CC: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>, "public-prov-wg@w3.org Group" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <4F438428.4050603@cs.man.ac.uk>

On 21/02/2012 11:29, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:51, Khalid Belhajjame
> <Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk>  wrote:
>
>> Do you mean that we may have an instance of EntityInvolvement  that does not
>> denote an agent association and in which the entity involved happens to be
>> an agent? For example, an activity that used as input an agent?
> Yes, of course, it's an entity.
>
> Example - the :photographing activity prov:used :me - even if :me is a
> prov:Person.
>
> I might or might not have been the agent associated with the activity.
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/PROV_OWL_ontology_component_examples#Self_portrait

Yes, I agree.
khalid
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 21 February 2012 11:47:55 UTC