public-prov-wg@w3.org from February 2012 by date

Wednesday, 29 February 2012

• [owl changed] Re: PROV-ISSUE-256 (TLebo): change namespace of prov-o Timothy Lebo
• RE: VOTE: PROV-DM Identifiers (deadline Wednesday 29/02, midnight GMT) Eric
• [owl changed] Re: PROV-ISSUE-256 (TLebo): change namespace of prov-o Timothy Lebo
• Re: URGENT feedback needed Re: ProvRDF: new mapping markup Timothy Lebo
• prov-wg: agenda Mar. 1, 2012 Paul Groth
• Re: URGENT feedback needed Re: ProvRDF: new mapping markup James Cheney
• URGENT feedback needed Re: ProvRDF: new mapping markup Timothy Lebo
• PROV-ISSUE-275 (TLebo): Not all prov:Bundles are sd:NamedGraphs [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: ProvRDF: new mapping markup Timothy Lebo
• Re: ProvRDF: new mapping markup Khalid Belhajjame
• ProvRDF: new mapping markup Timothy Lebo
• RE: VOTE: PROV-DM Identifiers (deadline Wednesday 29/02, midnight GMT) Miles, Simon
• Re: VOTE: PROV-DM Identifiers (deadline Wednesday 29/02, midnight GMT) Khalid Belhajjame
• Slides on PROV-AQ Olaf Hartig
• Re: VOTE: PROV-DM Identifiers (deadline Wednesday 29/02, midnight GMT) Jun Zhao
• Re: PROV-DM Simplification Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-DM Simplication Reviewer Feedback... Luc Moreau
• Re: Comments to the working draft 4 of DM Luc Moreau
• Re: {Disarmed} Feedback about DM draft 4 Luc Moreau
• Re: Review of PROV-DM (WD4) up to section 5 Luc Moreau
• Re: Comment on the DM Luc Moreau
• Re: Review of DM WD4 Luc Moreau
• PROV-ISSUE-274 (wd4-feedback): feedback on WD4 [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker

Tuesday, 28 February 2012

• Re: VOTE: PROV-DM Identifiers (deadline Wednesday 29/02, midnight GMT) Satya Sahoo
• Re: VOTE: PROV-DM Identifiers (deadline Wednesday 29/02, midnight GMT) Daniel Garijo
• Re: VOTE: PROV-DM Identifiers (deadline Wednesday 29/02, midnight GMT) Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-273 (name-for-asn): what name for the provenance notation [prov-dm] Satya Sahoo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-273 (name-for-asn): what name for the provenance notation [prov-dm] Jim McCusker
• Re: Provenance model, syntax and formal properties Luc Moreau
• PROV-ISSUE-273 (name-for-asn): what name for the provenance notation [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Collecting PROV examples Luc Moreau
• Re: Collecting PROV examples Reza B'Far (Oracle)
• Re: Collecting PROV examples Paul Groth
• Re: Collecting PROV examples Reza B'Far (Oracle)
• Re: Provenance model, syntax and formal properties Jim McCusker
• Re: Collecting PROV examples Paul Groth
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-272 (TLebo): PROV examples collection Eric Stephan
• Re: Collecting PROV examples Eric Stephan
• Re: Collecting PROV examples Timothy Lebo
• PROV-ISSUE-272 (TLebo): PROV examples collection Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• PROV-ISSUE-271 (TLebo): PROV examples collection Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Collecting PROV examples Timothy Lebo
• Re: Collecting PROV examples Timothy Lebo
• Re: Collecting PROV examples Timothy Lebo
• Re: Collecting PROV examples Timothy Lebo
• Re: Collecting PROV examples Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-270 (TLebo): automate HTML for OWL constructs [Ontology] Timothy Lebo
• Re: Collecting PROV examples Paul Groth
• Re: Collecting PROV examples Eric Stephan
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-270 (TLebo): automate HTML for OWL constructs [Ontology] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: Collecting PROV examples Paul Groth
• Re: Collecting PROV examples Luc Moreau
• Collecting PROV examples Timothy Lebo

Monday, 27 February 2012

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-270 (TLebo): automate HTML for OWL constructs [Ontology] Timothy Lebo
• Re: producing HTML documentation of RDFS/OWL Timothy Lebo
• PROV-ISSUE-270 (TLebo): automate HTML for OWL constructs [Ontology] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• producing HTML documentation of RDFS/OWL Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-259: hadTemporalExtent domain and range [Ontology] Stephan Zednik
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-268 (two-level-ontology): Two Level Ontology? [Ontology] Luc Moreau
• prov-o meeting today Timothy Lebo
• Re: VOTE: PROV-DM Identifiers (deadline Wednesday 29/02, midnight GMT) Curt Tilmes
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-268 (two-level-ontology): Two Level Ontology? [Ontology] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-268 (two-level-ontology): Two Level Ontology? [Ontology] Khalid Belhajjame
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-268 (two-level-ontology): Two Level Ontology? [Ontology] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-265 (TLebo): RL, why? [Ontology] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-268 (two-level-ontology): Two Level Ontology? [Ontology] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-268 (two-level-ontology): Two Level Ontology? [Ontology] Luc Moreau

Sunday, 26 February 2012

• Re: [provo] Characteristics of the object properties in the OWL ontology Daniel Garijo
• [provo] Characteristics of the object properties in the OWL ontology Khalid Belhajjame
• [provo] Re: PROV-ISSUE-269: involved property need to be renamed and its sup-properties need to be structured in a better manner Khalid Belhajjame
• PROV-ISSUE-269: involved property need to be renamed and its sup-properties need to be structured in a better manner Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker

Saturday, 25 February 2012

• prov-wg meeting minutes 2012-02-23 Luc Moreau
• Re: Collections in PROV-O Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] Luc Moreau

Friday, 24 February 2012

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] Paul Groth
• Comment on the DM Khalid Belhajjame
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] James Cheney
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-265 (TLebo): RL, why? [Ontology] Jim McCusker
• Re: Collections in PROV-O Paolo Missier
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-265 (TLebo): RL, why? [Ontology] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: prov-o review / comments Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: prov-o review / comments Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: Collections in PROV-O Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-258 (TLebo): consolidate Association / Responsibility / Affiliation [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: Collections in PROV-O Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: Collections in PROV-O Luc Moreau
• Re: Collections in PROV-O Paolo Missier
• Re: New prov-o ontology! Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: Collections in PROV-O Graham Klyne
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-259: hadTemporalExtent domain and range [Ontology] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• New prov-o ontology! Daniel Garijo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-268 (two-level-ontology): Two Level Ontology? [Ontology] Luc Moreau
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-268 (two-level-ontology): Two Level Ontology? [Ontology] Cresswell, Stephen
• Feedback about DM draft 4 Daniel Garijo
• Re: prov-o agenda Luc Moreau
• Re: prov-o agenda Paul Groth
• Re: resurrecting prov-o components design Paul Groth
• Re: Collections in PROV-O Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-260 (TLebo): In Note section: cite prov:Provenance as better practice to annotate assertions. [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: [prov-o] involvementClass property Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-265 (TLebo): RL, why? [Ontology] Luc Moreau
• PROV-ISSUE-268 (two-level-ontology): Two Level Ontology? [Ontology] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• prov-o agenda Luc Moreau
• Re: Provenance model, syntax and formal properties Graham Klyne
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-256 (TLebo): change namespace of prov-o Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-256 (TLebo): change namespace of prov-o Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-265 (TLebo): RL, why? [Ontology] Graham Klyne
• Re: Provenance model, syntax and formal properties Luc Moreau
• Re: Making PROV-O OWL-RL compliant Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-256 (TLebo): change namespace of prov-o Timothy Lebo
• Re: prov-o review / comments Timothy Lebo
• PROV-ISSUE-267 (TLebo): annotate all subproperty axioms to justify them [Ontology] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• Provenance model, syntax and formal properties Graham Klyne
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-259: hadTemporalExtent domain and range [Ontology] Timothy Lebo
• Re: Comments on PROV-O Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-260 (TLebo): In Note section: cite prov:Provenance as better practice to annotate assertions. [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
• Re: Comments on PROV-O Jim McCusker
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-257 (TLebo): rename "Account"/"Bundle"/"AccountEntity" to "Provenance" [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-DM Simplication Reviewer Feedback... Timothy Lebo
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement Timothy Lebo
• Re: [prov-o] How to express Involvement as as an "Abstract" class in OWL Timothy Lebo
• Re: Comments on PROV-O Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
• Re: [prov-o] involvementClass property Timothy Lebo
• Re: Collections in PROV-O Timothy Lebo
• Re: Collections in PROV-O Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-266 (TLebo): RL, why? [Ontology] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-262 (qualifier-property): entity used entity? [Ontology] Timothy Lebo
• PROV-ISSUE-266 (TLebo): RL, why? [Ontology] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• PROV-ISSUE-265 (TLebo): RL, why? [Ontology] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-262 (qualifier-property): entity used entity? [Ontology] Timothy Lebo
• Re: prov-wg: F2F2 Meeting Minutes Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] Timothy Lebo
• Re: reviewer feedback on prov-o ontology Timothy Lebo
• PROV-ISSUE-264 (TLebo): citing an Involvement and not a more specific Involvement. [Ontology] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: reviewer feedback on prov-o ontology Timothy Lebo
• Re: VOTE: PROV-DM Identifiers (deadline Wednesday 29/02, midnight GMT) Reza B'Far (Oracle)
• Re: VOTE: PROV-DM Identifiers (deadline Wednesday 29/02, midnight GMT) Timothy Lebo
• resurrecting prov-o components design Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-246 (TLebo): add plan example: web page tutorial [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-216 (TLebo): qualified wasAttributedTo? [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-261 (TLebo): alternateOf is not owl:sameAs (rephrase definition) [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo

Thursday, 23 February 2012

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-261 (TLebo): alternateOf is not owl:sameAs (rephrase definition) [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-216 (TLebo): qualified wasAttributedTo? [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-246 (TLebo): add plan example: web page tutorial [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• VOTE: PROV-DM Identifiers (deadline Wednesday 29/02, midnight GMT) Luc Moreau
• Action-61: PROV-SEM synchronized to WD3; please review James Cheney
• Re: reviewer feedback on prov-o ontology Jim McCusker
• Re: Review of PROV-DM (WD4) up to section 5 Graham Klyne
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] Stephan Zednik
• Re: Review of PROV-DM (WD4) up to section 5 Luc Moreau
• prov-wg: F2F2 Meeting Minutes Paul Groth
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-262 (qualifier-property): entity used entity? [Ontology] Stephan Zednik
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-262 (qualifier-property): entity used entity? [Ontology] Stephan Zednik
• Re: Collections in PROV-O Paolo Missier
• Re: Review of PROV-DM (WD4) up to section 5 Graham Klyne
• Re: Collections in PROV-O Jun Zhao
• Re: Comments to the working draft 4 of DM Paolo Missier
• Re: [prov-o] involvementClass property Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: Collections in PROV-O Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: reviewer feedback on prov-o ontology Luc Moreau
• Re: Collections in PROV-O Jun Zhao
• Re: Collections in PROV-O Jun Zhao
• Re: Collections in PROV-O Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: Collections in PROV-O Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Satya Sahoo
• Re: Comments on PROV-O Luc Moreau
• Re: reviewer feedback on prov-o ontology Luc Moreau
• Re: reviewer feedback on prov-o ontology Jim McCusker
• Re: Collections in PROV-O Jun Zhao
• Re: Comments on PROV-O Jun Zhao
• Primer update Miles, Simon
• Re: Collections in PROV-O Paolo Missier
• Re: reviewer feedback on prov-o ontology James Cheney
• Re: Collections in PROV-O Jun Zhao
• Re: reviewer feedback on prov-o ontology Luc Moreau
• Re: [prov-o] Start vs. StartByActivity Timothy Lebo
• Re: [prov-o] involvementClass property Timothy Lebo
• Re: reviewer feedback on prov-o ontology Jim McCusker
• Re: nice reference for qualified Timothy Lebo
• Re: nice reference for qualified Timothy Lebo
• Re: nice reference for qualified Paul Groth
• Re: [prov-o] How to express Involvement as as an "Abstract" class in OWL Luc Moreau
• Re: nice reference for qualified Timothy Lebo
• Re: Review of PROV-DM (WD4) up to section 5 Luc Moreau
• Comments on PROV-O Cresswell, Stephen
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-262 (qualifier-property): entity used entity? [Ontology] Daniel Garijo

Wednesday, 22 February 2012

• Review of DM WD4 Timothy Lebo

Thursday, 23 February 2012

• Review of PROV-DM (WD4) up to section 5 Graham Klyne
• Re: [prov-o] How to express Involvement as as an "Abstract" class in OWL Khalid Belhajjame
• Re: [prov-o] How to express Involvement as as an "Abstract" class in OWL Luc Moreau
• nice reference for qualified Paul Groth
• [prov-o] involvementClass property Stian Soiland-Reyes
• [prov-o] Start vs. StartByActivity Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: [prov-o] How to express Involvement as as an "Abstract" class in OWL Khalid Belhajjame
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: [prov-o] How to express Involvement as as an "Abstract" class in OWL Luc Moreau
• [prov-o] How to express Involvement as as an "Abstract" class in OWL Khalid Belhajjame
• Re: Collections in PROV-O Khalid Belhajjame
• Prov-wg - Minutes of 16 Feb 2012 Telecon Paul Groth
• Re: PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 23 Feb 2012 Luc Moreau
• reviewer feedback on prov-o ontology Luc Moreau
• PROV-ISSUE-263 (implicit-subject-problem): Implicit subject in Involvement causes mis-alignment [Ontology] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• PROV-DM Simplication Reviewer Feedback... Eric Stephan
• Re: Collections in PROV-O Stian Soiland-Reyes

Wednesday, 22 February 2012

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-257 (TLebo): rename "Account"/"Bundle"/"AccountEntity" to "Provenance" [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 23 Feb 2012 Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-260 (TLebo): In Note section: cite prov:Provenance as better practice to annotate assertions. [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-259: hadTemporalExtent domain and range [Ontology] Luc Moreau
• PROV-ISSUE-262 (qualifier-property): entity used entity? [Ontology] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• PROV-ISSUE-261 (TLebo): alternateOf is not owl:sameAs (rephrase definition) [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• PROV-ISSUE-260 (TLebo): In Note section: cite prov:Provenance as better practice to annotate assertions. [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• PROV-ISSUE-259: hadTemporalExtent domain and range [Ontology] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• PROV-ISSUE-258 (TLebo): consolidate Association / Responsibility / Affiliation [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• PROV-ISSUE-257 (TLebo): rename "Account"/"Bundle"/"AccountEntity" to "Provenance" [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Collections in PROV-O Khalid Belhajjame
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: ISSUE-135 ... ISSUE-139 Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-138 (collection-collision): Collection does not describe multiple additions/replacements [Data Model] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-137 (collection-isolation): Collection assertions does not guarantee isolation [Data Model] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-136 (collection-functional): Collection not stated as functional [Data Model] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-135 (collection-names): Collection relations have confusing names [Data Model], ISSUE-137, Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-139 (collection-emptylist): Collections don't provide a way to specify empty lists [Data Model] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-254 (TLebo): rename QualifiedInvolement to Involvement [Ontology] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Collections in PROV-O Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement Luc Moreau
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement Luc Moreau
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement Luc Moreau
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement Luc Moreau

Tuesday, 21 February 2012

• Re: Comments to the working draft 4 of DM Luc Moreau
• Re: Comments to the working draft 4 of DM Jun Zhao
• Re: Comments to the working draft 4 of DM Luc Moreau
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement Timothy Lebo
• Re: Comments to the working draft 4 of DM Jun Zhao
• Re: Comments to the working draft 4 of DM Luc Moreau
• Re: Comments to the working draft 4 of DM Paul Groth
• Re: Comments to the working draft 4 of DM Jun Zhao
• prov-o review / comments Paolo Missier
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement Khalid Belhajjame
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement Timothy Lebo
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement Paul Groth
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement Timothy Lebo
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement Timothy Lebo
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement Timothy Lebo
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement Timothy Lebo
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Making PROV-O OWL-RL compliant Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement Luc Moreau
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement Daniel Garijo
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement Stian Soiland-Reyes
• prov-wg: Report on HCLS call Paul Groth
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement Daniel Garijo
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement Khalid Belhajjame
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement Daniel Garijo
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement Khalid Belhajjame
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement Khalid Belhajjame
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement Khalid Belhajjame
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement Khalid Belhajjame
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] Luc Moreau
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement Timothy Lebo
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement Timothy Lebo

Monday, 20 February 2012

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Stephan Zednik
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Stephan Zednik
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-256 (TLebo): change namespace of prov-o Graham Klyne
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Stephan Zednik
• PROV-ISSUE-256 (TLebo): change namespace of prov-o Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Graham Klyne
• Re: Update on PROV-O OWL file (Action item 55) Graham Klyne
• PROV-ISSUE-255 (TLebo): rename ALL hadQualifiedXXX to simply prov:qualified Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] James Cheney
• PROV-ISSUE-254 (TLebo): rename QualifiedInvolement to Involvement [Ontology] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• PROV-O call (Feb 20) Satya Sahoo
• survey on (linked) data quality on the web Deus, Helena
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] Luc Moreau

Sunday, 19 February 2012

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] Satya Sahoo
• Re: Update on PROV-O OWL file (Action item 55) Satya Sahoo
• Re: Update on PROV-O OWL file (Action item 55) Satya Sahoo
• Re: Comments to the working draft 4 of DM Luc Moreau
• Re: Comments to the working draft 4 of DM Paul Groth
• Comments to the working draft 4 of DM Jun Zhao

Saturday, 18 February 2012

• Re: prov-wg: Another name for Qualified? Timothy Lebo
• Re: use case agent Paul Groth
• Re: use case agent Curt Tilmes
• Re: use case agent Jun Zhao
• Re: prov-wg: Another name for Qualified? Luc Moreau
• Re: use case agent Paul Groth
• Re: use case agent Zool0770
• Re: prov-wg: Another name for Qualified? Timothy Lebo
• Re: use case agent Eric Stephan
• Re: prov-wg: Another name for Qualified? Luc Moreau
• Re: prov-wg: Another name for Qualified? Timothy Lebo
• Re: prov-wg: Another name for Qualified? Timothy Lebo

Friday, 17 February 2012

• Re: prov-wg: Another name for Qualified? Timothy Lebo
• Re: prov-wg: Another name for Qualified? Paul Groth
• Re: prov-wg: Another name for Qualified? Luc Moreau
• Re: prov-wg: Another name for Qualified? Timothy Lebo
• Re: prov-wg: Another name for Qualified? Timothy Lebo
• Re: prov-wg: Another name for Qualified? Paul Groth
• Re: prov-wg: Another name for Qualified? Luc Moreau
• Re: prov-wg: Another name for Qualified? Timothy Lebo
• Re: prov-wg: Another name for Qualified? Paul Groth
• Re: prov-wg: Another name for Qualified? Luc Moreau
• Re: prov-wg: Another name for Qualified? Paul Groth
• Re: prov-wg: Another name for Qualified? Timothy Lebo
• Re: prov-wg: Another name for Qualified? Luc Moreau
• Re: prov-wg: Another name for Qualified? Paul Groth
• Re: prov-wg: Another name for Qualified? Timothy Lebo
• Re: use case agent Paul Groth
• Re: use case agent Stephan Zednik
• Re: use case agent Reza B'Far (Oracle)
• Re: use case agent Stephan Zednik
• Re: use case agent Stephan Zednik
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] Luc Moreau
• Re: prov-wg: Another name for Qualified? Paul Groth
• Re: Updated PROV-O OWL and ProvRDF wiki page Paul Groth
• Re: Update on PROV-O OWL file (Action item 55) Luc Moreau
• Re: Updated PROV-O OWL and ProvRDF wiki page Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Updated PROV-O OWL and ProvRDF wiki page Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: Update on PROV-O OWL file (Action item 55) Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] Luc Moreau
• Re: Update on PROV-O OWL file (Action item 55) Curt Tilmes
• Re: prov-wg: Another name for Qualified? Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] James Cheney
• use case agent Paul Groth
• Re: PROV-O ontology comments Luc Moreau
• rdf mapping of example in prov-dm example Luc Moreau
• Re: ACTION-55 is reopened Luc Moreau
• Re: ACTION-55 is reopened Stian Soiland-Reyes
• 2nd CFP: 4th Intl. Provenance and Annotation Workshop (IPAW'2012) Paul Groth
• Re: Primer actions Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: Update on PROV-O OWL file (Action item 55) Ivan Herman
• ACTION-55 is reopened Luc Moreau

Thursday, 16 February 2012

• Re: Prov-wg: Telecon agenda Feb 16, 2012 Graham Klyne
• Re: Update on PROV-O OWL file (Action item 55) Satya Sahoo
• Re: Update on PROV-O OWL file (Action item 55) Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-O ontology comments Satya Sahoo
• Re: Update on PROV-O OWL file (Action item 55) Paul Groth
• PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: PROV-O ontology comments Satya Sahoo
• Re: Update on PROV-O OWL file (Action item 55) Satya Sahoo
• Re: Update on PROV-O OWL file (Action item 55) Luc Moreau
• Re: Update on PROV-O OWL file (Action item 55) Satya Sahoo
• quick updates of the ontology Paul Groth
• Re: Update on PROV-O OWL file (Action item 55) Luc Moreau
• Re: ACTION-56: ProvRDF mappings ready for review James Cheney
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-105: 5.3.1 Generation (current version of the conceptual model document) [Conceptual Model] Satya Sahoo
• ACTION-56: ProvRDF mappings ready for review James Cheney
• The Quality of Linked Data (with an emphasis on drug discovery) Deus, Helena
• Re: PROV-O ontology comments Jun Zhao
• prov-wg: Another name for Qualified? Paul Groth
• Re: Primer actions Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-O is currently within OWL-DL can we make OWL-RL? Paul Groth
• Re: Update on PROV-O OWL file (Action item 55) Stian Soiland-Reyes
• PROV-O is currently within OWL-DL can we make OWL-RL? Paul Groth
• Primer actions Simon Miles
• Re: Update on PROV-O OWL file (Action item 55) Luc Moreau
• PROV-O ontology comments Simon Miles
• Re: Update on PROV-O OWL file (Action item 55) Ivan Herman

Wednesday, 15 February 2012

• Re: PROV-DM Simplification Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-DM Simplification Curt Tilmes
• Re: PROV-DM Simplification Luc Moreau
• Re: bootstrapping testcases for prov Stephan Zednik
• ISSUE-135 ... ISSUE-139 Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-187: Section 5.2.2 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-200: Section 6.3 (PROV-DM as on Dec 5) [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-193: Section 5.3.2.2 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-192: Section 5.3.2.1 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Paul Groth
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Jim McCusker
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Reza B'far
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Paul Groth

Tuesday, 14 February 2012

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Satya Sahoo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Reza B'Far (Oracle)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Satya Sahoo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Reza B'Far (Oracle)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Satya Sahoo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-187: Section 5.2.2 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Satya Sahoo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-200: Section 6.3 (PROV-DM as on Dec 5) [prov-dm] Satya Sahoo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-193: Section 5.3.2.2 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Satya Sahoo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-192: Section 5.3.2.1 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Satya Sahoo
• Update on PROV-O OWL file (Action item 55) Satya Sahoo
• PROV-ISSUE-252 (TLebo): Examples for prescribed prov attributes location and time [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• PROV-ISSUE-251 (TLebo): put "location" attribute into prov: prefix [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping Timothy Lebo
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping Timothy Lebo
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping Timothy Lebo
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping Luc Moreau
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping Timothy Lebo
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping Luc Moreau
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping Luc Moreau
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping Timothy Lebo
• Prov-wg: Telecon agenda Feb 16, 2012 Paul Groth
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping Timothy Lebo
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping Timothy Lebo
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping Luc Moreau
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping James Cheney
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping Luc Moreau
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping James Cheney
• Re: closing issues Yolanda Gil
• Re: closing issues Luc Moreau
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping Luc Moreau
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping Luc Moreau
• Re: bootstrapping testcases for prov Timothy Lebo
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping Timothy Lebo
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping Timothy Lebo
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping Satya Sahoo
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping Satya Sahoo

Monday, 13 February 2012

• Re: closing issues Paul Groth
• bootstrapping testcases for prov Paul Groth
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Jim McCusker
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-249 (two-derivations): Why do we have 3 derivations? [prov-dm] Miles, Simon
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Stephan Zednik
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Reza B'far
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Reza B'Far (Oracle)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Reza B'Far (Oracle)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Satya Sahoo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Satya Sahoo
• Re: PROV-O call on Feb 13 Satya Sahoo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Jim McCusker
• Re: PROV-O call on Feb 13 Paul Groth
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping Luc Moreau
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping Luc Moreau
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping James Cheney
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping Luc Moreau
• closing issues Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-187: Section 5.2.2 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-189: Section 5.2.4 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-185: Section 3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-187: Section 5.2.2 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-186: Section 5.2.1 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Reza B'Far (Oracle)
• Re: Connection Task Force Meeting Monday Feb 13 Eric
• PROV-O call on Feb 13 Satya Sahoo
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping Timothy Lebo

Sunday, 12 February 2012

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Satya Sahoo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Satya Sahoo
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping Timothy Lebo
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping Paul Groth
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Satya Sahoo
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping Daniel Garijo
• quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping Paul Groth
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Paul Groth
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Olaf Hartig
• Re: prov-o team to list left hand sides of DM mapping rules Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-187: Section 5.2.2 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Paul Groth
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Miles, Simon
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Paul Groth
• Re: prov-o team to list left hand sides of DM mapping rules Satya Sahoo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-189: Section 5.2.4 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Satya Sahoo

Saturday, 11 February 2012

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-187: Section 5.2.2 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Satya Sahoo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Satya Sahoo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-187: Section 5.2.2 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Satya Sahoo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-186: Section 5.2.1 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Satya Sahoo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-185: Section 3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] Satya Sahoo

Friday, 10 February 2012

• Re: Scruffy vs proper Graham Klyne
• Re: prov-o team to list left hand sides of DM mapping rules Timothy Lebo
• Re: prov-o team to list left hand sides of DM mapping rules Daniel Garijo
• Re: prov-o team to list left hand sides of DM mapping rules Timothy Lebo
• Re: prov-o team to list left hand sides of DM mapping rules Daniel Garijo
• Re: Scruffy vs proper (was: PROV-ISSUE-249 (two-derivations): Why do we have 3 derivations? [prov-dm]) Daniel Garijo
• Scruffy vs proper (was: PROV-ISSUE-249 (two-derivations): Why do we have 3 derivations? [prov-dm]) Graham Klyne
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-249 (two-derivations): Why do we have 3 derivations? [prov-dm] Daniel Garijo
• prov-o team to list left hand sides of DM mapping rules Timothy Lebo
• PROV-ISSUE-250 (TLebo): respond to Eric's comments [Ontology] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• PROV-O Review Comments to Sections 1 - 3.1.6 Eric Stephan
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-249 (two-derivations): Why do we have 3 derivations? [prov-dm] Khalid Belhajjame

Thursday, 9 February 2012

• PROV-ISSUE-249 (two-derivations): Why do we have 3 derivations? [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• PROV-ISSUE-248 (string-as-entity): How to model strings? [Formal Semantics] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• scribe required Luc Moreau
• blog post on third working draft of the prov-dm Paul Groth

Tuesday, 7 February 2012

• Re: PROV ISSUE-206 some possible proposals Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-239 (TLebo): is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful? [prov-dm] Stian Soiland-Reyes

Wednesday, 8 February 2012

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-247: Regarding Collections in prov-dm [prov-dm] Khalid Belhajjame
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-247: Regarding Collections in prov-dm [prov-dm] Paolo Missier
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-233 (paq-dm-and-accounts?): If not in DM, should there be some form of account support in the paq? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Graham Klyne
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-233 (paq-dm-and-accounts?): If not in DM, should there be some form of account support in the paq? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Paul Groth
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-233 (paq-dm-and-accounts?): If not in DM, should there be some form of account support in the paq? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-233 (paq-dm-and-accounts?): If not in DM, should there be some form of account support in the paq? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Graham Klyne
• PROV-ISSUE-247: Regarding Collections in prov-dm [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-233 (paq-dm-and-accounts?): If not in DM, should there be some form of account support in the paq? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Luc Moreau
• Re: F2F chat log online? Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-233 (paq-dm-and-accounts?): If not in DM, should there be some form of account support in the paq? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Graham Klyne
• F2F chat log online? Graham Klyne

Tuesday, 7 February 2012

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-239 (TLebo): is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful? [prov-dm] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Connection Task Force Meeting Monday Feb 13 Eric Stephan
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-245 (TLebo): entity was used -> __started__ to be used Khalid Belhajjame
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-239 (TLebo): is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful? [prov-dm] Khalid Belhajjame
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-237 (TLebo): Rename Relation to Involvement [prov-dm] Khalid Belhajjame
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-236 (TLebo): rendered provenance is a thing in the world [prov-dm] Khalid Belhajjame
• PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 9 Feb 2012 Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-242 (TLebo): generated twice? [prov-dm] Graham Klyne
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-233 (paq-dm-and-accounts?): If not in DM, should there be some form of account support in the paq? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-242 (TLebo): generated twice? [prov-dm] Paolo Missier
• Re: PROV ISSUE-206 some possible proposals Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-242 (TLebo): generated twice? [prov-dm] Paolo Missier
• Re: PROV ISSUE-206 some possible proposals Timothy Lebo
• Re: Update Connection TF Kai Eckert
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-239 (TLebo): is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful? [prov-dm] Paolo Missier
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-233 (paq-dm-and-accounts?): If not in DM, should there be some form of account support in the paq? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-233 (paq-dm-and-accounts?): If not in DM, should there be some form of account support in the paq? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-239 (TLebo): is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful? [prov-dm] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-242 (TLebo): generated twice? [prov-dm] Daniel Garijo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-242 (TLebo): generated twice? [prov-dm] Daniel Garijo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-242 (TLebo): generated twice? [prov-dm] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-239 (TLebo): is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful? [prov-dm] Daniel Garijo
• Prov presentation for HCLS Sci Discourse Task Force Paul Groth
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-239 (TLebo): is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful? [prov-dm] Paolo Missier
• Re: PROV ISSUE-206 some possible proposals Paul Groth
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-246 (TLebo): add plan example: web page tutorial [prov-dm] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-239 (TLebo): is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful? [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-237 (TLebo): Rename Relation to Involvement [prov-dm] Reza B'Far (Oracle)
• Re: Update Connection TF Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-239 (TLebo): is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful? [prov-dm] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV ISSUE-206 some possible proposals Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-237 (TLebo): Rename Relation to Involvement [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-239 (TLebo): is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful? [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-237 (TLebo): Rename Relation to Involvement [prov-dm] Reza B'Far (Oracle)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-239 (TLebo): is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful? [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-237 (TLebo): Rename Relation to Involvement [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-237 (TLebo): Rename Relation to Involvement [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo

Monday, 6 February 2012

• Re: PROV ISSUE-206 some possible proposals Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-243 (TLebo): how to interpret ASN assertions with incomplete arity? Paolo Missier
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-242 (TLebo): generated twice? [prov-dm] Paolo Missier
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-239 (TLebo): is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful? [prov-dm] Paolo Missier
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-241 (TLebo): remove ex:order=2 in generation example Paolo Missier
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-240 (TLebo): highlight optionals in wasGeneratedBy([id],e,a,[t],[attrs]) [prov-dm] Paolo Missier
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-237 (TLebo): Rename Relation to Involvement [prov-dm] Reza B'Far (Oracle)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-237 (TLebo): Rename Relation to Involvement [prov-dm] Paolo Missier
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-239 (TLebo): is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful? [prov-dm] Paolo Missier
• PROV-ISSUE-246 (TLebo): add plan example: web page tutorial [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• PROV-ISSUE-245 (TLebo): entity was used -> __started__ to be used Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• PROV-ISSUE-244 (TLebo): wasGeneratedBy(x,a,attrs,t) transposed arguments Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• PROV-ISSUE-243 (TLebo): how to interpret ASN assertions with incomplete arity? Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-240 (TLebo): highlight optionals in wasGeneratedBy([id],e,a,[t],[attrs]) [prov-dm] Daniel Garijo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-239 (TLebo): is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful? [prov-dm] Daniel Garijo
• PROV-ISSUE-242 (TLebo): generated twice? [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• PROV-ISSUE-241 (TLebo): remove ex:order=2 in generation example Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-237 (TLebo): Rename Relation to Involvement [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
• PROV-ISSUE-240 (TLebo): highlight optionals in wasGeneratedBy([id],e,a,[t],[attrs]) [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• PROV-ISSUE-239 (TLebo): is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful? [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• PROV-ISSUE-238 (TLebo): order relation sections to suit a natural traversal of the Relation table [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• PROV-ISSUE-237 (TLebo): Rename Relation to Involvement [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• PROV-ISSUE-236 (TLebo): rendered provenance is a thing in the world [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Update Connection TF Eric Stephan
• Re: Update Connection TF runnegar@isoc.org
• Re: PROV-O call (Feb 6) Satya Sahoo
• Re: Update Connection TF Kai Eckert
• Re: Update Connection TF Eric Stephan
• PROV-O call (Feb 6) Satya Sahoo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-234 (TLebo): id identifies entity, not the record [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
• Update Connection TF Kai Eckert
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-234 (TLebo): id identifies entity, not the record [prov-dm] Paolo Missier
• Re: why provenance matters :-) Paolo Missier
• PROV-ISSUE-235 (TLebo): add MAY to namespace defining "schema" [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• more fuel for the thing vs. entity fire Timothy Lebo
• PROV-ISSUE-234 (TLebo): id identifies entity, not the record [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: why provenance matters :-) Daniel Garijo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-233 (paq-dm-and-accounts?): If not in DM, should there be some form of account support in the paq? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-233 (paq-dm-and-accounts?): If not in DM, should there be some form of account support in the paq? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Graham Klyne
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-233 (paq-dm-and-accounts?): If not in DM, should there be some form of account support in the paq? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-233 (paq-dm-and-accounts?): If not in DM, should there be some form of account support in the paq? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Graham Klyne

Sunday, 5 February 2012

• Re: prov-xml: initiating discussion Luc Moreau
• Re: prov-xml: initiating discussion James Cheney
• PROV-ISSUE-233 (paq-dm-and-accounts?): If not in DM, should there be some form of account support in the paq? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• prov-wg: blog post on f2f Paul Groth
• F2F2 Meeting Summary Paul Groth
• prov-xml: initiating discussion Luc Moreau

Saturday, 4 February 2012

• Fwd: URI Template spec has been approved Graham Klyne

Friday, 3 February 2012

• Re: update on Action 55 (updating prov-o ontology) Satya Sahoo
• Next version of prov-o ontology for internal review Khalid Belhajjame
• update on Action 55 (updating prov-o ontology) Paul Groth
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-207 (start and end records): start and end records [prov-dm] Simon Miles
• PROV ISSUE-206 some possible proposals Paul Groth
• PROV-SEM slides James Cheney
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-232 (TLebo): activity start/end: direct time upgrades to instantaneous events [Ontology] Timothy Lebo
• PROV-ISSUE-232 (TLebo): activity start/end: direct time upgrades to instantaneous events [Ontology] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• Alex Hall's review of the XSD 1.1 changes and their relevance to the RDF WG Ivan Herman
• Fwd: JWS special issue: reasoning with context in the Semantic Web, v12 (2012) Ivan Herman

Thursday, 2 February 2012

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-231 (TLebo): Remove owl:Time from prov-o [Ontology] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-231 (TLebo): Remove owl:Time from prov-o [Ontology] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-231 (TLebo): Remove owl:Time from prov-o [Ontology] Khalid Belhajjame
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-231 (TLebo): Remove owl:Time from prov-o [Ontology] Daniel Garijo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-231 (TLebo): Remove owl:Time from prov-o [Ontology] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• PROV-ISSUE-231 (TLebo): Remove owl:Time from prov-o [Ontology] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker

Wednesday, 1 February 2012

• f2f agenda and introduction Luc Moreau
• why provenance matters :-) Paolo Missier
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-229 (Refactor-and-sub-edit): Document would benefit from refactoring and editing [prov-dm] Stian Soiland-Reyes

Last message date: Wednesday, 29 February 2012 22:46:22 UTC