- From: Jim McCusker <mccusj@rpi.edu>
- Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 19:28:43 +0000
- To: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 28 February 2012 19:29:36 UTC
I propose Provenance Notation (PROV-N). Since it's parseable and inter-convertable, it's not abstract. It's a domain-specific language for provenance. Jim On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker < sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: > PROV-ISSUE-273 (name-for-asn): what name for the provenance notation > [prov-dm] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/273 > > Raised by: Luc Moreau > On product: prov-dm > > > What name for the provenance notation? And which short prefix? > > PROV-ASN stands for Abstract Syntax Notation ... but it's not an abstract > syntax. > > Suggestions? > > Luc > > > > > > -- Jim McCusker Programmer Analyst Krauthammer Lab, Pathology Informatics Yale School of Medicine james.mccusker@yale.edu | (203) 785-6330 http://krauthammerlab.med.yale.edu PhD Student Tetherless World Constellation Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute mccusj@cs.rpi.edu http://tw.rpi.edu
Received on Tuesday, 28 February 2012 19:29:36 UTC