- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 10:56:47 -0500
- To: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- Cc: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <9E9D6E2B-A216-428E-BB10-CF7878ABD624@rpi.edu>
On Feb 28, 2012, at 2:57 AM, Paul Groth wrote: > Hi Tim, all: > > I like the proposal. I was wondering if instead of having different directories for serialization we could put examples in one directory and mark what serialization it's specific for. > > So using your pattern, I would add the mimetype: > > 'eg-'<number>-asn-['-'title] > 'eg-'<number>-ttl-['-'title] So these two would be equivalent content but differ in format? I'm handling this within the nested directories, which lets us convey which is the original format. This example is in the document, and is rdf converted to asn: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/file/tip/examples/rdf/eg-1/convert/asn/eg-1.asn -Tim > > What do you think? > Paul > > > Timothy Lebo wrote: >> prov-wg, >> >> I drafted a proposal for how the wg could organize concrete PROV >> examples. >> >> Please have a look at [1] and provide feedback before meeting this >> Thursday. >> >> We are planning to ask for volunteers to help populate the PROV >> example collection to reflect their particular domains (or to put >> toy/text examples in, too). >> >> I don't expect to be able to anticipate all ways that we will want to >> organize them, but I took a stab at it. If there are better ways, >> please let me know before we start populating the collection. >> >> Thanks for your consideration. >> >> Regards, Tim >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/PROV_examples > - >
Received on Tuesday, 28 February 2012 15:57:22 UTC