- From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 09:30:00 +0000
- To: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Dear prov-o team,
In my review, I focused on a subset usage, derivation, generation, and
association
I raised a few issues:
- (ISSUE-253) http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/253
some properties (e.g. activity, entity, adoptedPlan) of involvements
need to made functional
- (ISSUE-253) http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/253
the domain of hadTemporalExtent is broader than in prov-dm
- (ISSUE-262) http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/262
the ontology seems to allow an entity to be used (with qualified
usage) by another entity.
- (ISSUE-263) http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/263
Involvements such as usage can be shared by multiple activities.
Furthermore, the ontology allows for instances of involvements to be
expressed, without
specifying its subclass (Usage, Generation, etc). This is not aligned
with the data model.
Choice of name: I understand 'hadTemporalExtent' as 'had a duration'.
But Usage and Generation,
for instance, have got instantaneous time. I don't understand why
xsd:dateTime is not directly associated
by means of a data property.
Regards,
Luc
--
Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487
University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865
Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Thursday, 23 February 2012 09:30:29 UTC