- From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 23:30:49 +0000
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <EMEW3|077bd1f82337c57a43c87bb682ff1fa4o1MNUx08L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4F46CC29>
Hi Tim, I have reassigned this issue the ontology. I believe that you have implemented it and the issue can be closed. Luc On 17/01/12 23:08, Luc Moreau wrote: > Thanks Daniel, > > Tim, Could you confirm and reassign to prov-o? > > Thanks, > Luc > > On 17/01/12 11:28, Daniel Garijo wrote: >> Hi Luc, >> maybe this issue is more for the prov-o document than for prov-dm. >> Currently, wasAttributedTo is binary. We should add a >> QualifiedInvolvement >> for this relationship too in order to be able to add the set of >> optional attributes. >> >> Daniel >> >> 2012/1/17 Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk >> <mailto:L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>> >> >> Hi Tim, >> >> Revisiting your request, I don't understand it. >> An attribution record already contains optional attribute-value >> pairs. >> What do you mean by qualified wasAttributedTo relation? >> >> Thanks, >> Luc >> >> >> On 01/16/2012 02:31 PM, Luc Moreau wrote: >> >> Hi Tim, >> This seems like a reasonable request. >> It looks like all our relations should have attributes. >> Luc >> >> On 01/15/2012 04:37 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue >> Tracker wrote: >> >> PROV-ISSUE-216 (TLebo): qualified wasAttributedTo? [prov-dm] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/216 >> >> Raised by: Timothy Lebo >> On product: prov-dm >> >> Accounts will likely be associated to their asserters >> with the prov:wasAttributedTo binary relation. >> >> Would the DM be able to have qualified wasAttributedTo >> relations? >> >> I think that it would be a natural question for a >> consumer, upon hearing that "account x was from agent y", >> to want to ask about how, when, or in what situation >> agent y stated those things (e.g., under oath in a >> courtroom, on twitter 2am on a Friday night, etc). >> >> Hopefully, the Qualified wasAttributedTo would follow the >> pattern of the varying "precisions" (i.e., granularity) >> for wasDerivedFrom, which may relate an activity that >> draws the Account to the asserter. >> >> Thanks, >> Tim >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Professor Luc Moreau >> Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 >> <tel:%2B44%2023%208059%204487> >> University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 >> <tel:%2B44%2023%208059%202865> >> Southampton SO17 1BJ email: >> l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk <mailto:l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> >> United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm >> <http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/%7Elavm> >> >> >>
Received on Thursday, 23 February 2012 23:31:26 UTC