- From: Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
- Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 11:32:57 +0100
- To: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2012 10:37:14 UTC
Hi Tim, this is an interesting question. Right now wasGeneratedBy is functional, so you can assert those 2 assertions, but it would be inconsistent. However this could bring up problems when nesting activities, as in a workflow domain (but that's another issue, so I'll leave it out of this thread). Daniel 2012/2/6 Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> > PROV-ISSUE-242 (TLebo): generated twice? [prov-dm] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/242 > > Raised by: Timothy Lebo > On product: prov-dm > > Is the following valid? > > wasGeneratedBy(e,,2001-10-26T21:32:52) > wasGeneratedBy(e,,2011-11-27T21:23:34) > > If no, where does DM say so? > > Thanks, > Tim > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2012 10:37:14 UTC