- From: Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
- Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 23:25:24 +0100
- To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAExK0DfUQxaoXwmjD+=zrhxP52R744RGS2s1i-BuMKB+EsAemw@mail.gmail.com>
I had already answered in the revision thread, but +1 to close the issues. Best, Daniel 2012/2/28 Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> > > Dear all, > > Kind reminder for a vote. > > Thanks, > > Professor Luc Moreau > Electronics and Computer Science > University of Southampton > Southampton SO17 1BJ > United Kingdom > > On 24 Feb 2012, at 00:21, "Luc Moreau" <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote: > > > > > Dear all, > > > > Today, we have agreed [1] to reorganize the PROV-DM deliverable in three > separate documents: > > > > PROV-DM: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm.html > > PROV-DM-CONSTRAINTS: > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm-constraints.html > > PROV-ASN: > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-asn.html > > > > As part of the reorganization, we dropped the notion of 'record', the > notion of 'account record', the > > idea of 'nested account records', and associated idea of scope, in the > spirit of simplification discussed > > at F2F2. > > > > Given this, we propose to close all issues related to identifiers, > namely: > > > > - ISSUE-145, > > - ISSUE-183, > > - ISSUE-215, > > - ISSUE-225 and > > - ISSUE-234 > > > > Can you express your support in the usual way, or continue the > discussion for the respective issues. > > (Please cast a vote for each issue). > > > > Deadline: deadline Wednesday 29/02, midnight GMT > > > > Regards, > > Luc > > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/meeting/2012-02-23#resolution_2 > >
Received on Tuesday, 28 February 2012 22:25:53 UTC