Re: Tim's approach on Involvement

On Feb 21, 2012, at 6:26 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:31, Stian Soiland-Reyes
> <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 04:58, Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu> wrote:
>> 
>>> I'm adopting your naming of the new properties (activity, entity, qualified)
>>> Based on your lead, I deleted the subprops of qualified, which trims the ontology up nicely, but I'm wondering how one figures out the pattern.
>> 
>> This looks pretty good. Thanks for also updating ProvRDF. I'll go
>> through it with  my changes from below.
> 
> Fixed various things that were missing on ProvRDF.. several
> involvements did not include their prov:entity! ;-)
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF now matches the OWL file.

+10000

> 
> 
> I updated the OWL file again as my mind processed the ProvRDF page:
> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/tip/ontology/ProvenanceOntology.owl

Thanks :-)

> 
> 
> 
> actedOnBehalfOf and tracedTo subproperty of involved
> hadOriginalSource subprop of wasDerivedFrom (according to DM)
> hadQuotedAgent and hadQuoterAgent no longer subprop of entity (they
> confuse with the 'real' entity in the Quotation)

This is certainly the case. Good catch.

-Tim


> 
> End subclass of Association - but Start subclass of Involvement (as it
> plays double role on http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF#Starting
> and http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF#Starting_again )
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team
> School of Computer Science
> The University of Manchester
>

Received on Tuesday, 21 February 2012 16:34:02 UTC